Volume 29 Issue 1
Contents
Miscellany
Registers of beneficial ownership of companies: an update 1
Articles
The role of the Deputy Bailiff of Jersey
Robert MacRae 3
This article sketches the history, process of appointment and varied role of the Deputy Bailiff of Jersey.
The role of the Attorney General as Jersey’s authority for mutual legal assistance
Mark Temple 14
The Attorney General’s function as Jersey’s Central Authority for mutual legal assistance receives relatively little attention compared with other functions such as Jersey’s Chief Prosecutor. This article seeks to correct that deficiency and explains why the function is a crucial one.
Royal assent in the Crown Dependencies: is there a need for change?
Lucy Marsh-Smith and Matthew Berry 44
This paper was produced as background to a presentation given at the Commonwealth Association of Legislative Counsel (CALC) Europe Region conference in Cardiff on 25 May 2023 in response to one from Simon Hodgett, Crown Advocate and Legislative Counsel at the Law Officers of the Crown in Guernsey and is updated from a version published in CALC’s journal. It considers the current system for granting Royal Assent in the three Crown Dependencies in the light of the recent changes in the system in Guernsey and the article by Megan Pullum and Simon Hodgett in the June issue of this journal. Interest in the matter stems from the time it takes to obtain Royal Assent in Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man when compared with other Commonwealth jurisdictions. The need to continue to look for ways to streamline the procedure is something for which the UK Parliament’s Justice Select Committee has recently expressed its support. The paper considers improvements to the system and workarounds from the Jersey perspective, discusses recent developments in Guernsey and examines the procedures and time taken across the three jurisdictions. In contrast with the Guernsey paper mentioned above, it considers Royal Assent in the Crown Dependencies more from a practical rather than historical perspective.
Good faith and Jersey contract law
Christopher J Tan 62
While not exactly caught between a rock and a hard place, Jersey contract law has had, on occasion—in the words of former Bailiff Sir Philip Bailhache—its civilian “foundation stones” intermixed with “common law bricks”. These different legal traditions sometimes pull Jersey jurisprudence in different directions; in this regard, the Jersey Court of Appeal’s recent decision in HRCKY Ltd v Hard Rock Ltd is to be welcomed in the ongoing quest for coherence. While it is unlikely that this judgment will be the last word in this matter, the court’s rejection of any blanket duty of good faith or general doctrine of réticence dolosive in Jersey contract law: (i) goes some way in resolving an area of longstanding controversy in local jurisprudence; (ii) is consistent with Jersey customary law; and (iii) underscores Jersey’s reputation as a jurisdiction where commercial counterparties can allocate risk predictably. It is the alignment of the customary law with commercial common sense.
Shorter article
Judicial review and laws passed by the States Assembly
Philip Bailhache 73
The Court of Appeal delivered an important judgment in Buckley v Minister for Treasury and Resources ([2024] JCA288). This case note records the decision that a Law passed by the States Assembly, and the Acte Opératoire giving it immediate effect, are not amenable to judicial review. The constitutional ramifications are also summarized.
Case Summaries 77
Summary of Legislation: 1 September–31st December 2024
Bailiwick of Jersey 92
Bailiwick of Guernsey
Guernsey 97
Alderney 110
Sark 111
Notes for Contributors Inside back cover