Mental Health (Jersey)
Law 2016
A LAW to make provision as to the care and treatment of persons suffering
mental disorder; and as to the treatment, under the criminal justice system, of
offenders and other persons who may suffer mental disorder; and for connected
purposes
Commencement [see endnotes]
Part 1
Interpretation, application and other general
provisions
1 Interpretation
(1) In this
Law –
“admission application” means an application under
Article 18;
“approved establishment” means an establishment or premises
approved by the Minister under Article 5;
“approved practitioner” means a person approved by the
Minister under Article 16;
“assessment authorization” has the meaning given by
Article 21;
“authorized officer” means a person authorized by the
Minister under Article 6;
“Capacity Law” means the Capacity and
Self-Determination (Jersey) Law 2016;
“child” means a person under the age of 18 years;
“code of practice” means a code of practice issued under
Article 90;
“Court”, except in Parts 8 and 9, means the Royal
Court;
“function” includes, unless the context does not so
permit, both a power and a duty;
“learning disability” means a state of arrested or
incomplete development of the mind which includes significant impairment of
intelligence and social functioning;
“mental disorder” means, subject to paragraphs (2)
and (3), any disorder or disability of the mind;
“MHA” means an independent mental health advocate
appointed under Article 79;
“Minister” means the Minister for Health and Social
Services;
“nearest relative” –
(a) in
relation to certain patients aged under 18, has the meaning given by
Article 9;
(b) in
relation to all other patients, has the meaning given by Article 8;
“nearest person”, in relation to a patient, means the
person determined, nominated or appointed as such under Part 2;
“patient”, unless otherwise specifically provided, means
a person suffering or appearing to be suffering mental disorder, whether or not
that person is undergoing treatment at the time of the application of a
particular provision of this Law;
“prescribed” means prescribed by an Order made by the
Minister under Article 95;
“registered medical practitioner” means a person
registered as a medical practitioner under the Medical Practitioners
(Registration) (Jersey) Law 1960;
“responsible medical officer” means a registered medical
practitioner with specialist training in psychiatry who is –
(a) in
relation to a patient liable to be detained under Part 3, the registered
medical practitioner with overall responsibility for the treatment of that
patient;
(b) in
relation to a patient subject to guardianship under Part 4, any registered
medical practitioner authorized by the Minister to act, either generally or in
any particular case, as the responsible medical officer;
“SOAD” has the meaning given by Article 38(3);
“treatment”, unless otherwise specifically provided,
means any treatment for mental disorder, and includes (but without
limitation) –
(a) psychiatric
or physical treatment or nursing;
(b) medication;
(c) cognitive,
behavioural or other therapy;
(d) counselling
or other psychological intervention;
(e) training
or other rehabilitation;
whether or not provided on a regular basis, or by or in an approved
establishment;
“treatment authorization” has the meaning given by Article 22(2);
“Tribunal” means the Mental Health Review Tribunal constituted
under Part 7.
(2) A person with learning
disability shall not be considered by reason of that disability to be suffering
from mental disorder for the purposes of Part 3, unless the learning
disability is associated with abnormally aggressive or seriously irresponsible
conduct on the part of that person.
(3) Dependence on alcohol
or drugs is not to be considered mental disorder or any other disability of the
mind for the purposes of this Law.
(4) In this Law, except in
Part 8, a reference to a person’s capacity or lack of capacity is,
unless otherwise indicated, to be interpreted in accordance with the Capacity
Law.
(5) The States may by
Regulations amend this Article.
2 Minister’s
primary duty
(1) The Minister’s
primary duty under this Law is to make provision in Jersey for the care and
treatment of persons suffering mental disorder.
(2) In carrying out the
duty imposed by paragraph (1), the Minister must in particular –
(a) appoint
an administrator in accordance with Article 4;
(b) approve
establishments or premises in accordance with Article 5;
(c) appoint,
approve or, as the case may be, authorize all such medical and other officers
and persons as may from time to time be necessary for the purpose of giving
effect to this Law, and in particular such officers and persons as are required
to be appointed, approved or authorized under Articles 6, 16 and 38;
(d) keep,
and publish, a register of such appointments, approvals and authorizations, in
whatever manner the Minister considers appropriate; and
(e) issue
a code of practice in accordance with Article 90.
3 Ancillary
functions of the Minister
(1) The Minister may do
anything which appears to the Minister to be necessary, conducive or expedient
to the proper discharge of the duty imposed by Article 2.
(2) In particular, and
without derogation to the generality of paragraph (1), the Minister
may –
(a) upon
appointing or authorizing any person, impose such terms and conditions as the
Minister may think fit;
(b) provide,
or secure the provision of, establishments and facilities for care and
treatment, and management and general supervision of such establishments and
facilities;
(c) arrange,
or make arrangements for –
(i) the admission and
reception of persons into such establishments,
(ii) the
treatment, care and detention of patients in such establishments, and
(iii) the
treatment and care of patients who are not admitted to nor liable to be
detained in approved establishments;
(d) provide,
or secure the provision of, centres or other facilities for training,
occupation and employment of patients, and the equipment and maintenance of
such centres or facilities;
(e) provide,
or secure the provision of, ancillary or supplementary services designed
for –
(i) the promotion of
better mental health,
(ii) the
prevention of mental disorder,
(iii) promoting
better care and treatment of patients, and
(iv) the
welfare of patients.
4 Appointment
of administrator
(1) The Minister must
appoint a person to be the administrator in relation to such matters under this
Law, and under Part 5 of the Capacity Law, as the Minister may (by code of
practice or otherwise) direct.
(2) The administrator must
publish an annual report containing such information as the Minister may
direct, including (but not limited to) details as to approved establishments
and practitioners, and as to applications to the Mental Health Review Tribunal.
5 Approved
establishments
(1) The Minister must
approve establishments or premises for the purpose of the care and treatment of
patients, upon such terms and conditions as (subject to paragraph (2)) the
Minister may think fit.
(2) The Minister may not
exercise the function conferred by paragraph (1) unless the Minister is
satisfied that, having regard to the best available treatment, the standard of
treatment provided by the establishment or premises in question is appropriate
and adequate.
6 Authorized
officers
(1) The Minister may authorize
as officers for the purposes of this Law (including, where appropriate, for the
purpose of carrying out functions conferred on the Minister under this Law)
such persons –
(a) as
are registered pursuant to the Health Care (Registration)
(Jersey) Law 1995; and
(b) have
such training and experience in the field of mental health and in the
application of mental health legislation and practice as may be prescribed,
upon such terms and conditions as the Minister may think fit.
(2) An authorized officer
must perform his or her functions under this Law –
(a) with
fairness and impartiality; and
(b) in
the best interests of any patient with whose care or treatment he or she is
involved.
(3) The Minister may revoke
an authorization under this Article, and may vary any terms and conditions upon
which such an authorization is granted.
Part 2
The ‘nearest person’
7 Nearest
person in relation to a patient
(1) In relation to every
patient there shall be a natural person who fulfils the role of the
patient’s nearest person for the purposes of this Law.
(2) A patient’s
nearest relative (as determined in accordance with Article 8 or 9)
shall be that patient’s nearest person, unless a nomination is made under
Article 10 or an appointment is made under Article 11.
(3) The nearest person
shall have all such functions as are conferred by this Law and in particular
the right to act on behalf of the patient as further provided by Article 13.
(4) The role of a nearest
person as defined by this Article is additional to, and does not derogate from,
the role of an independent mental health advocate under Article 79.
8 Definition
of ‘nearest relative’
(1) This Article applies to
determine the nearest relative of –
(a) a
patient aged 18 or over;
(b) a
patient under 18 years of age to whom Article 9 does not apply.
(2) Where the patient (when
not admitted for treatment) ordinarily resides with or is cared for by a
relative, that relative is the patient’s nearest relative.
(3) A relative for the
purposes of this Part is a person who, at the time the question falls to be
determined (the “relevant time”), is the
patient’s –
(a) spouse
or civil partner;
(b) son
or daughter;
(c) father
or mother;
(d) brother
or sister;
(e) grandparent;
(f) grandchild;
(g) uncle
or aunt; or
(h) nephew
or niece.
(4) In any case where
paragraph (2) does not apply, the patient’s nearest relative is the
living person who at the relevant time is first (according to the rules given
by paragraphs (5) and (6)) in the list in paragraph (3).
(5) In determining priority
of relationships for the purposes of paragraph (3) –
(a) in
respect of sub-paragraphs (1)(b) to (h) –
(i) a relative of the
whole blood shall be preferred to a relative of the same description of the
half-blood, but otherwise a relative of the half-blood shall be treated as a
relative of the whole blood, and
(ii) the
elder or eldest of 2 or more relatives in any of those sub-paragraphs shall be
preferred to any other of those relatives, regardless of sex;
(b) an
adopted person shall be treated as the child of the person or persons by whom
he or she was adopted;
(c) a
child of persons who are not married to, or in a civil partnership with, each
other shall be treated –
(i) as the child of
his or her mother, or
(ii) where
the child’s father has parental responsibility for the child, as the
child of his or her father.
(6) A person who would,
apart from this paragraph, be the patient’s nearest relative but who, at
the relevant time –
(a) in
the case of a patient ordinarily resident in Jersey, is not so resident;
(b) being
the patient’s spouse or civil partner –
(i) is permanently
separated from the patient, either by agreement or under an order of court, or
(ii) has
deserted, or been deserted by, the patient for a period which has not come to
an end; or
(c) not
being the spouse, civil partner, father or mother of the patient, is
under 20 years of age,
shall be disregarded for the purposes of paragraph (3).
9 ‘Nearest
relative’ of certain patients aged under 18
(1) This Article applies to
determine the person deemed to be the nearest relative of a patient who is –
(a) under 18 years
of age; and
(b) within
one of the cases described in paragraphs (2) to (4).
(2) In a case where the
rights and powers of a parent of the patient are vested in the Minister or in
any other person by order of a court, that person is the patient’s
nearest relative, in preference to any other person except a spouse or civil
partner of the patient.
(3) In a case where –
(a) the
patient is a minor under tutelle; and
(b) his
or her guardian is a person other than –
(i) the
patient’s nearest relative as determined by Article 8, or
(ii) a
nearest person appointed under Article 11,
the guardian shall be the patient’s nearest relative, in
preference to any other person.
(4) In a case where the
patient is in the custody of any person –
(a) by
virtue of an order made by a court –
(i) in the exercise
of its jurisdiction whether customary or conferred by enactment,
(ii) in
matrimonial proceedings or proceedings for the annulment or dissolution of a
civil partnership; or
(b) by
virtue of a separation agreement made between the patient’s father and
mother,
the person having custody shall be the patient’s nearest
relative, in preference to any other person.
10 Nomination
of nearest person
(1) A patient who is aged 18
or over may nominate a person as his or her nearest person, in the prescribed
form or in writing substantially to the same effect and sent to –
(a) the
person nominated; and
(b) the
Minister.
(2) The Minister may nominate
a person as the patient’s nearest person by giving notice in writing to
that person, where –
(a) a
patient –
(i) is under 18 years
of age, or
(ii) lacks
the necessary capacity to make such an appointment;
and
(b) the patient’s
nearest relative –
(i) cannot be
identified, or
(ii) has
confirmed in writing to the Minister that he or she is unable or unwilling to
act as the patient’s nearest person.
(3) A nomination under paragraph (1)
or (2) –
(a) shall
not take effect unless the person nominated (“R”) has given his or
her consent, in the prescribed form or in writing substantially to the same
effect, to acting as the patient’s nominated nearest person; and
(b) may
be revoked or varied by further written notice given by the patient or, as the
case may be, by the Minister.
(4) A patient may nominate
more than one person under paragraph (1), but in doing so must indicate by
that nomination the priority in which the appointees are to act.
(5) R must cease to act as
the patient’s nearest person in any respect under this Law, upon the
occurrence of any of the following events –
(a) the
revocation by the patient of R’s nomination;
(b) the
revocation by the Minister of R’s appointment;
(c) the
death of either the patient or R;
(d) the
withdrawal by R, by notice in writing, of R’s consent;
(e) an
order of the court under Article 11 appointing a person other than R as
the patient’s nearest person.
11 Appointment
of nearest person by the Court
(1) On an application made
to the Court –
(a) by
one of the persons listed in paragraph (2) (the “applicant”);
and
(b) stating
one of the grounds listed in paragraph (4),
the Court may by order appoint the applicant to be the
patient’s nearest person, if the applicant consents to do so and in the
opinion of the Court the applicant is a proper person to carry out the
functions of a nearest person.
(2) The applicant may
be –
(a) the
patient;
(b) an
authorized officer;
(c) any
relative of the patient;
(d) any
other person with whom the patient ordinarily resides (when not admitted for
treatment).
(3) In the case of an
application made by an authorized officer, paragraph (1) shall apply as if
for the word “applicant”, in each place except sub-paragraph (a),
there were substituted the word “Minister”.
(4) An application for an
order may be made –
(a) where
no nearest person has been nominated under Article 10, on any of the
following grounds –
(i) that the patient
has no nearest relative or that it is not reasonably practicable to determine
whether or not the patient has a nearest relative, or the identity of such a
relative,
(ii) that
the patient’s nearest relative is incapable of acting as such by reason
of mental disorder or other illness, or
(iii) that
the patient’s nearest relative is otherwise not a suitable person to act
as such, by reason of matters which shall be stated in the application;
(b) where
a nearest person has been nominated under Article 10, on either of the
following grounds –
(i) that the
nominated nearest person is incapable of acting as such by reason of mental
disorder or other illness, or
(ii) that
the nominated nearest person is otherwise not a suitable person to act as such,
by reason of matters which shall be stated in the application.
12 Discharge,
variation and cessation of orders under Article 11
(1) An order under Article 11
may be discharged by the Court on an application made –
(a) in
any case, by –
(i) the patient, or
(ii) the
patient’s nearest person appointed by the order; or
(b) where –
(i) the order was
made on a ground specified in paragraph (4)(a)(i) or (ii) of that Article,
or
(ii) a
person who was the patient’s nearest relative when the order was made has
ceased to be the patient’s nearest relative,
by a person who claims to be the patient’s nearest relative,
under Article 8 or 9.
(2) An order under Article 11
may be varied by the Court on the application of –
(a) the patient’s
nearest person appointed by the order; or
(b) a
duly authorized officer,
by substituting for that nearest person the Minister or any other
person who, in the opinion of the Court, is a proper person and is capable of,
and consents to, carrying out the functions of the patient’s nearest
person.
(3) If the nearest person
appointed by an order under Article 11 dies, the provisions of this
Article shall apply as if for any reference to that person there were
substituted a reference to any relative of the patient, and until the order is
discharged or varied under this Article, no person shall exercise the functions
of the patient’s nearest person.
(4) An order under Article 11
shall cease to have effect in accordance with either paragraph (5) or
paragraph (6), unless it is first discharged under paragraph (1).
(5) If –
(a) on
the date of the order, the patient was liable to be detained or was subject to
guardianship under Part 4; or
(b) within
the period of 3 months beginning with the date of the order, the patient
became liable to be detained or subject to guardianship,
the order shall cease to have effect when the patient ceases to be
so liable or so subject, other than by being transferred under Article 26.
(6) If, on the date of the
order, the patient was not liable to be detained or subject to guardianship
under Part 4 and has not become so liable or so subject within the period
of 3 months beginning with the date of the order, the order shall cease at
the expiration of that period.
(7) Discharge, variation or
cessation of an order under this Article shall not affect the validity of
anything done under the order prior to such discharge or variation.
13 Rights
of nearest person to receive information as to patient’s care or
treatment
(1) Unless one of the
conditions in paragraph (3) is satisfied –
(a) the
responsible medical officer must provide the nearest person with details (in
writing, where reasonably practicable) of any care or treatment proposed in
respect of the patient;
(b) the
nearest person is entitled to make representations to the responsible medical
officer about such proposals; and
(c) the
responsible medical officer must, in prescribing or administering care or
treatment to the patient, have regard to any representations made under sub-paragraph (b).
(2) In particular and
without derogation from the general requirement in paragraph (1)(a), the
responsible medical officer must inform the nearest person –
(a) where
a treatment authorization is renewed under Article 22, of the reasons for
renewal mentioned in Article 22(4)(a);
(b) of
any leave of absence granted under Article 24, and of any conditions
(including treatment conditions) attaching to such leave of absence;
(c) where
a plan of treatment is formulated for the purposes of Part 6, of the
contents of the plan and of any significant changes which may be made to the
plan from time to time;
(d) of
any proposed treatment for which a certificate would be required from a SOAD
under Article 40 or 41; and
(e) of
such other details of a kind which may be specified in a code of practice.
(3) The conditions
mentioned in paragraph (1) are that –
(a) where
the patient has capacity to do so, the patient has refused to give consent to
the disclosure to the nearest person of the details of proposed care or
treatment (whether generally or in a particular instance);
(b) where
the patient lacks capacity to give or refuse consent, the responsible medical
officer considers that it is not in the patient’s best interests to
disclose such details; or
(c) in
any other case, the responsible medical officer considers that disclosure of such
details would be likely to cause serious harm to the patient or to any other
person.
(4) Where one of the
conditions in paragraph (3) is satisfied, the responsible medical officer
shall inform the nearest person (in writing, where reasonably practicable) that
details under paragraph (1) are not provided for that reason, identifying
the particular condition which is satisfied in the case.
(5) A nearest person is
entitled to be informed of any proposed transfer of a patient under Article 26,
and of the date of such transfer.
(6) This Article applies in
addition to, and not in derogation from, any rights otherwise conferred on a
nearest person by this Law or any other enactment.
Part 3
Approved establishments: admissions for
assessment, treatment, etc.
14 Voluntary
admissions
(1) If a patient requires
or wishes to receive treatment, nothing in this Law shall prevent the patient –
(a) from
being admitted to any approved establishment for treatment in pursuance of
arrangements made for that purpose, without an admission application being made
under Article 18; or
(b) from
remaining in the establishment, with the consent of the responsible medical
officer, after ceasing to be liable to be detained.
(2) Where a patient
aged 16 years or over, who has capacity to do so, consents to the
making of arrangements such as are mentioned in paragraph (1), those
arrangements may be made, carried out and determined on the basis of that
consent, even though there are one or more persons having parental
responsibility for that patient.
(3) Where a patient
aged 16 years or over, who has capacity to give consent, does not
consent to the making of arrangements such as are mentioned in paragraph (1),
those arrangements may not be made, carried out or determined on the basis of
consent given by a person who has parental responsibility for that patient.
15 Emergency
admissions
(1) This Article applies in
a case where a patient –
(a) is
brought to, or presents himself or herself at, an approved establishment; or
(b) has
been admitted to an approved establishment under arrangements such as are
mentioned in Article 14(1)(a), but no longer consents to remain.
(2) Where this Article
applies and, in the opinion of an approved practitioner, there is an urgent
necessity for the patient to be admitted for assessment on the grounds
that –
(a) it is
likely that the patient is suffering from mental disorder; and
(b) allowing
the patient to remain at liberty would endanger either the patient’s
safety or that of other persons,
the approved practitioner may authorize immediate admission of the
patient, and the patient may be detained for a period not exceeding the time
limits in paragraph (4).
(3) For the purposes of paragraph (2),
there is no urgent necessity where an application for assessment or treatment
authorization under Article 21 or 22 could be made without undue
delay.
(4) Authorization of
detention under this Article shall expire –
(a) at
the end of the period of 72 hours beginning with the time when the opinion
mentioned in paragraph (2) is formed;
(b) when,
in the opinion of an approved practitioner, the grounds in paragraph (2)
no longer apply in respect of the patient; or
(c) when
the patient is admitted for assessment or treatment under Article 21 or
22,
whichever is the first to occur.
(5) Authorization under paragraph (2)
and the approved practitioner’s opinion under paragraph (4)(b) shall
be recorded in writing, and a copy of the authorization shall be sent to the
Minister, as soon as practicable.
16 Approved
practitioners
(1) A registered medical
practitioner may be approved by the Minister under this Article where the
Minister is satisfied, on the production of such evidence as may be prescribed,
that the practitioner has sufficient experience and training in the field of
mental health and in the operation of legislation relating to mental health.
(2) Approval of a person
under this Article may be granted upon such terms and conditions as the
Minister thinks fit, and the approval may be revoked and any terms or
conditions upon which it is granted may be varied by the Minister.
17 Detention
by nurse
(1) This Article applies
where –
(a) a
patient (other than a patient already liable to be detained under this Part) is
receiving treatment for mental disorder as an in-patient in an approved establishment;
and
(b) it
appears to a registered nurse that –
(i) the patient is
suffering from a mental disorder,
(ii) to
allow the patient to be at liberty would endanger the patient’s safety or
the safety of other persons, and
(iii) it is
not practicable to secure the immediate attendance of an approved practitioner.
(2) Where this Article
applies –
(a) the
nurse must make a record in writing of the matters in paragraph (1)(b);
and
(b) subject
to paragraph (3), the patient may be detained in the approved
establishment for a period of no longer than 6 hours beginning at the time
the record is made.
(3) If an approved
practitioner attends the patient during the final hour of the period mentioned
in paragraph (2)(b), the patient may be detained for a further period of
no longer than one hour beginning at the time of that attendance.
(4) A nurse who makes a
record under paragraph (2) must deliver that record as soon as possible
after making it to the managers of the approved establishment.
(5) For the purposes of
this Article, “registered nurse” means a person registered as a
nurse under the Health Care (Registration)
(Jersey) Law 1995.
18 Applications
for admission of patient: general requirements
(1) An application for the
admission of a patient on the grounds set out in Article 21 or 22 must be
made in writing to the Minister and in accordance with this Article and Article 19.
(2) An application under
this Article (an “admission application”) must –
(a) be
made by an authorized officer –
(i) who has
personally seen the patient within the period of 7 days ending with the
date of the application, and
(ii) following
consultation with the patient’s nearest person, unless such consultation
is not reasonably practicable or would involve unreasonable delay;
(b) contain
a statement that, in the opinion of each of the practitioners making
recommendations as required by paragraph (3), the grounds for admission
stated in Article 21(1) or 22(1) (as the case may be) are met; and
(c) be
sent by the authorized officer to the Minister as soon as practicable after the
application has been completed in accordance with this Article and Article 19.
(3) All such applications
must include, or be accompanied by, recommendations of 2 registered medical
practitioners (the “medical recommendations”, as to which further
provision is made by Article 19), one of whom must be an approved
practitioner.
(4) Subject to paragraph (5),
the medical recommendations may be given either –
(a) as
separate documents, each signed by the practitioner by which it is made; or
(b) as a
joint document signed by both practitioners.
(5) Where a form of
application is prescribed, an application must be made using that form.
(6) For the avoidance of
doubt, an admission application may be made in respect of the further detention
of a patient already admitted to an approved establishment –
(a) on a
voluntary basis, under Article 14; or
(b) on an
emergency basis, under Article 15.
19 Medical
recommendations: further requirements
(1) Medical recommendations
must –
(a) be
given by practitioners who have personally examined the patient either jointly
or, if separately, at an interval of not more than 5 days; and
(b) be
signed, by those giving them, on or before the date of the application to which
they relate.
(2) An approved
practitioner giving medical recommendations should, where practicable, have
previous acquaintance with the patient in relation to whom the recommendations
are made (but where both practitioners giving the recommendations are approved
practitioners, this requirement shall apply only to one of them).
(3) Medical recommendations
may not be given by –
(a) the
authorized officer making the application under Article 18;
(b) a
partner of, or person employed by, the applicant or a practitioner by whom
medical recommendations are given for the purposes of the same application;
(c) a
person who receives or has an interest in the receipt of any payments made for
maintenance of the patient;
(d) a
relative of the patient or of any person mentioned in sub-paragraphs (a)
to (c) (and relationship for this purpose includes relationship of the
half-blood).[1]
20 Effect
of admission application
(1) An admission
application which is made in accordance with Articles 18 and 19 shall
be sufficient authority, at any time within the period of 72 hours
beginning with the time at which the application is made –
(a) for
the applicant, or any person authorized by the applicant, to take the patient
and convey him or her to an approved establishment; and
(b) provided
that the requirements of paragraph (2) are fulfilled, for the managers of
the approved establishment (“M” in this Part) to admit the patient
and detain him or her in the approved establishment for a period of no longer
than one week beginning with the date of admission (the “initial
period”).
(2) A copy of the admission
application must be provided to M at the time when the patient is admitted
under paragraph (1)(b), and if M is satisfied that –
(a) the
admission application appears to have been duly made in accordance with
Articles 18 and 19; and
(b) the
admission is within the period of 72 hours mentioned in paragraph (1),
M must, as soon as reasonably practicable and in any event no later
than 24 hours before the end of the initial period, give notice in writing
to the Minister that the patient to whom the admission application relates has
been admitted to the approved establishment.
(3) An admission
application may be acted upon under paragraphs (1) and (2) without further
proof of the signature or qualification of the applicant or of any person
making medical recommendations, or of any matter of fact or opinion stated in
the application.
(4) Following receipt of
notice under paragraph (2) and within the initial period, the Minister
must –
(a) confirm
in writing to M that the admission application has been duly made; and
(b) authorize
the admission and further detention of the patient –
(i) for assessment
under Article 21, or
(ii) for
treatment under Article 22,
as the case may be.
(5) Admission and detention
under this Article is subject to the rights conferred on a patient by Article 50(1).
(6) For the avoidance of
doubt –
(a) if M
is not satisfied as provided by paragraph (2); or
(b) the
Minister’s authorization under paragraph (4) is not received by M
within the initial period,
M must release the patient from detention.
21 Assessment
authorization
(1) An application for
admission of a patient for assessment may be made on the grounds that –
(a) the
patient appears to be suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree
which warrants the detention of the patient in an approved establishment, with
or without treatment, for at least a limited period; and
(b) it is
necessary –
(i) in the interests
of the patient’s health or safety, or
(ii) for
the protection of other persons,
that the patient should be so detained.
(2) Where the Minister
gives an authorization under Article 20(4)(b)(i) (an “assessment
authorization”) –
(a) subject
to paragraph (4), the patient may be detained in the approved
establishment for a specified period of no longer than 28 days beginning
with the date on which the patient is admitted; and
(b) during
such detention the patient may be provided with any appropriate and lawful
treatment.
(3) An assessment
authorization may not be renewed.
(4) Where the admission
application relates to a patient who was first admitted under Article 14
or 15, the period mentioned in sub-paragraph (2)(a) shall begin with the
day on which the admission application is received by M.
(5) Paragraph (2) is
subject to the rights conferred on a patient by Article 50(1).
22 Treatment
authorization
(1) An application for
admission of a patient for treatment may be made on the grounds that –
(a) the
patient appears to be suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree
which warrants the detention of the patient in an approved establishment for
treatment; and
(b) it is
necessary –
(i) in the interests
of the patient’s health or safety, or
(ii) for
the protection of other persons,
that the patient should be so detained.
(2) Where the Minister
gives an authorization under Article 20(4)(b)(ii) (a “treatment
authorization”) –
(a) the
patient may be detained in the approved establishment for a period of no longer
than 6 months beginning with the date on which the patient is admitted;
and
(b) during
such detention the patient may be provided with any appropriate and lawful
treatment.
(3) A treatment authorization
may be renewed for one additional period of 6 months, and thereafter for
further periods of 12 months, in accordance with paragraph (4).
(4) Within the period of
2 months immediately preceding the day on which the patient’s
liability to detention ceases, the responsible medical officer must examine the
patient and make a report to the Minister recommending –
(a) the
renewal of the treatment authorization, if it appears to the responsible
medical officer that it is necessary –
(i) in the interests
of the patient’s health or safety, or
(ii) for
the protection of other persons,
that the patient should continue to be liable to be detained; or
(b) that
the treatment authorization should not be renewed.
(5) Where a report under paragraph (4)
is provided in respect of a patient, the Minister must –
(a) inform
the patient and the patient’s nearest person of the recommendations and
the action proposed to be taken; and
(b) where
the report contains a recommendation under paragraph (4)(a), renew the
treatment authorization for the appropriate period as provided by paragraph (3).
(6) Where the report
contains a recommendation under paragraph (4)(b), the responsible medical
officer must discharge the patient.
(7) Where the admission
application relates to a patient who was first admitted under Article 14
or 15, the period mentioned in sub-paragraph (2)(a) shall begin with the
day on which the admission application is received by M.
(8) Where a treatment
authorization is renewed under paragraph (3), any additional or further
period of detention for which the renewal is granted (the “new
period”) shall begin immediately following the expiration of the previous
period of detention, and paragraphs (4) and (5) shall apply in respect of
the new period.
(9) Paragraphs (2),
(3) and (4)(a) are subject to the rights conferred on a patient by Article 50(1).
23 Rectification
of applications and medical recommendations
(1) Paragraph (2)
applies in a case where it appears to the Minister or to the managers of an
approved establishment that the admission application or any related medical
recommendation is incorrect or defective.
(2) Where this paragraph
applies –
(a) the
error or defect in question may, with the consent of the Minister, be rectified
by the applicant or (as the case may be) the person who signed the
recommendation; and
(b) the
application or recommendation shall have effect (and be deemed to have had
effect) as though duly completed without the error or defect.
(3) Without prejudice to
paragraph (1), if within the initial period mentioned in Article 20(1)
it appears to the managers of an approved establishment that a medical
recommendation related to any application is insufficient to warrant the
detention of the patient, the managers may within the same period give notice
in writing of the insufficiency to the applicant and of the fact that the
recommendation shall be disregarded.
(4) Where notice is given
under paragraph (3), the application to which the recommendation relates
shall nevertheless be (and be deemed always to have been) sufficient
if –
(a) a
fresh recommendation which complies with Article 19(1) to (3) and is not
defective in any respect is provided to the managers; and
(b) that
recommendation, taken together with any other recommendation relating to the
same application, is sufficient to warrant the detention of the patient.
24 Leave
of absence from approved establishment
(1) The responsible medical
officer may in accordance with this Article grant, to any patient who is liable
to be detained in an approved establishment under this Part, leave to be absent
from that establishment.
(2) The grant of leave
under paragraph (1) may be made unconditionally, or subject to conditions –
(a) of a
kind which may be prescribed; and
(b) in
any particular case, such as the responsible medical officer may consider
necessary –
(i) in the interests
of the patient’s health or safety, or
(ii) for
the protection of other persons.
(3) Leave of absence may be
granted –
(a) on
specified occasions;
(b) for
any specified period; or
(c)(subject to Article 25)
indefinitely.
(4) Where
leave of absence is granted –
(a) for a
specified period exceeding 7 days; or
(b) for
an indefinite period,
the responsible medical officer must give notice in writing to the
Minister of the grant of leave, the period for which, and the conditions (if
any) upon which leave is granted.
(5) Subject to paragraphs (7)
and (8), where leave of absence is granted for any specified period, that
period may be extended by further leave granted in the absence of the patient.
(6) Where it appears to the
responsible medical officer that it is necessary to do so –
(a) in
the interests of the patient’s health or safety; or
(b) for
the protection of other persons,
that officer may, on granting leave of absence, direct that the
patient shall remain in custody during the absence; and in such a case the
patient may be kept in the custody of any member of staff of the approved
establishment or of any other person authorized for that purpose by the
responsible medical officer.
(7) Where a patient is
absent on leave granted under this Article, and it appears to the responsible
medical officer that it is necessary to do so –
(a) in
the interests of the patient’s health or safety; or
(b) for
the protection of other persons,
that officer may (subject to paragraph (9) and to the rights
conferred on a patient by Article 50(1)), by notice in writing to the
patient or to the person having custody of the patient under paragraph (6),
revoke the leave of absence and recall the patient to the approved
establishment.
(8) The responsible medical
officer may from time to time vary or suspend, by notice in writing to the
patient or to the person having custody of the patient under paragraph (6),
the period for which and any conditions (other than conditions prescribed under
paragraph (2)(a)) upon which leave of absence is granted.
(9) A patient to whom leave
of absence is granted for an indefinite period shall not be recalled under paragraph (7)
after the patient has ceased to be liable to be detained under this Part.
(10) For the avoidance of doubt
and without derogation from the generality of the power conferred by paragraph (2)(a),
conditions to be prescribed under that sub-paragraph may include conditions as
to the examination of a patient or the review of a patient’s treatment,
at such times or intervals as may be prescribed, by the responsible medical
officer (or, where the patient’s treatment is of a kind requiring consent
under Part 6, by the responsible medical officer and a SOAD).
25 Return
of patients absent without leave
(1) This Article applies
where a patient who is for the time being liable to be detained in an approved
establishment –
(a) absents
himself or herself from the establishment without leave granted under Article 24;
or
(b) fails
to return to the establishment –
(i) on any occasion,
or at the expiration of any period, for which leave was granted to the patient
under that Article, or
(ii) upon
being recalled under paragraph (7) of that Article.
(2) Where this Article
applies the patient may be taken into custody and returned to the establishment
by –
(a) the
managers of that establishment or any member of staff of the establishment
authorized for that purpose by the managers; or
(b) a
police officer.
(3) Detention of the
patient in custody or following return to an approved establishment under paragraph (2)
is subject to the rights conferred on a patient under Article 50(1).
(4) A patient shall not be
taken into custody under this Article after the expiration of the period of 6 months
beginning with the first day of the patient’s absence without leave, and
a patient who has not returned to the establishment nor been taken into custody
within that period shall, at the expiration of that period, cease to be liable
to be detained.
26 Transfer
of patients
(1) The Minister may
arrange for the transfer of a patient liable to be detained under this Part
from one approved establishment to another.
(2) Where a patient is
transferred pursuant to arrangements made under paragraph (1), this Part
shall apply to the patient as if –
(a) the
admission application by virtue of which the patient was liable to be detained
were an application for admission to the approved establishment to which the
patient is transferred; and
(b) the
patient had been admitted to that establishment at the time when the patient
was originally admitted under the admission application.
27 Discharge
of patients
(1) A responsible medical
officer may, in accordance with this Article and having regard to the care and
supervision which would be available to the patient if discharged, direct the
discharge of a patient from the approved establishment in which the patient is
liable to be detained.
(2) The responsible medical
officer must direct the discharge of the patient unless –
(a) the
exception in paragraph (6) applies; or
(b) having
regard to the care or supervision which would be available to the patient if
discharged, the responsible medical officer is satisfied that –
(i) the patient is
suffering from a mental disorder of a nature or degree which warrants continued
detention and treatment, and
(ii) it
is necessary for the patient to be detained in the interests of the
patient’s health or safety, or for the protection of other persons.
(3) Where a direction for
discharge is duly made under this Article, any assessment authorization or
treatment authorization relating to the patient in question shall cease to have
effect.
(4) Notice in writing of
the discharge must be given by the responsible medical officer to –
(a) the
patient;
(b) the
patient’s nearest person;
(c) the
Minister; and
(d) the
managers of the approved establishment,
and where a form is prescribed for the purpose, must be given in
that form.
(5) A patient’s
nearest person may give notice in writing to the responsible medical officer
requesting the exercise of the power to discharge the patient, and where such
notice is given –
(a) the
responsible medical officer shall consider the request, unless another such
request from the same nearest person has been received by that officer within
the period of 30 days ending on the date of receipt of the notice; and
(b) if
the responsible medical officer decides not to discharge the patient, reasons
for that decision must be given in writing to the nearest person.
(6) A direction for
discharge of a patient detained pursuant to the provisions of Part 9 may
be made under this Article, except that no such direction shall be made for
discharge of a defendant in respect of whom a treatment order under Article 65
is made subject to special restrictions under Article 68.
28 Special
provisions: patient absent without leave
(1) Paragraph (2)
applies where a patient is absent without leave –
(a) on
the day on which (apart from this Article) the patient would cease to be liable
to be detained under this Part or to be subject to guardianship under Part 4;
or
(b) within
the period of one week ending on that day.
(2) Where this paragraph
applies, the patient shall continue to be liable to be detained, or (as the
case may be) subject to guardianship under Part 4, until the expiration of
the period of one week beginning with the day on which the patient is returned
under Article 25 or 31, or returns to the approved establishment or to the
place where (under the terms of his or her guardianship) the patient ought to
be.
(3) Where the period for
which a patient is liable to be detained or is subject to guardianship is
extended by the application of paragraph (2), any examination or report
under Article 22(4) or 33(4) may be made within that period as so
extended.
(4) Paragraph (5)
applies where –
(a) later
than the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the first day on
which a patient is absent without leave; but
(b) before
the end of the period of 6 months beginning with that day,
the patient is returned under Article 25 or 31, or returns to
the approved establishment or to the place where (under the terms of his or her
guardianship) the patient ought to be.
(5) Where this paragraph
applies, an approved practitioner must, within the period of one week beginning
with the day of the patient’s return –
(a) examine
the patient and, if the patient is a patient liable to be detained, consult
such other persons concerned with the patient’s care or treatment as may
be appropriate; and
(b) if it
appears to the responsible medical officer that the conditions in paragraph (6)
are fulfilled, make a report in writing to that effect to M and to the
Minister.
(6) The conditions
mentioned in paragraph (5)(b) are that –
(a) the
patient appears to be suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree
which warrants –
(i) the detention of
the patient in an approved establishment for treatment, or
(ii) the
reception of the patient into guardianship; and
(b) it is
necessary –
(i) in the interests
of the patient’s health or safety, or
(ii) for
the protection of other persons,
that the patient should be so detained or received.
(7) Where the patient would
(apart from paragraphs (1) to (3)) have ceased to be liable to be detained
or subject to guardianship on, before, or within the period of 2 months
beginning with, the day on which the report is provided under paragraph (5)(b) –
(a) the
report shall renew any existing authorization under Article 21, 22 or 30,
as the case may be; and
(b) that renewal
shall take effect from the day on which the existing authorization would (but
for this paragraph) have expired,
for a period of no longer than 6 months beginning with that day
(and in the case of an authorization under Article 22, the provisions of Article 22(3)
to (9) shall apply afresh as though the report were a treatment authorization
under that Article).
Part 4
Guardianship
29 Application
for guardianship
(1) An application for the
reception of a patient into guardianship (a “guardianship application”)
must be made in writing to the Minister and in accordance with this Article.
(2) All such applications
must –
(a) be
made by an authorized officer –
(i) who has
personally seen the patient within the period of 7 days ending with the
date of the application, and
(ii) following
consultation with the patient’s nearest person, unless such consultation
is not reasonably practicable or would involve unreasonable delay;
and
(b) contain
a statement that, in the opinion of each of the persons required by paragraph (4),
the grounds stated in paragraph (3) are met.
(3) The grounds mentioned
in paragraph (2)(b) are that –
(a) the
patient appears to be suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree
which warrants the reception of the patient into guardianship; and
(b) it is
necessary for the patient to be received into guardianship –
(i) in the interests
of the patient’s welfare, or
(ii) for
the protection of other persons.
(4) All such applications
must include, or be accompanied by, recommendations of 2 registered medical
practitioners (the “medical recommendations”, as to which Article 19
shall apply as if the application were an application under Part 3), one
of whom must be an approved practitioner.
(5) The medical
recommendations may be given either –
(a) as
separate documents, each signed by the practitioner by which it is made; or
(b) as a
joint recommendation signed by both practitioners.
(6) A guardianship
application shall be of no effect unless –
(a) it is
received by the Minister within the period of 7 days beginning with the
date on which the patient was last examined by a registered medical
practitioner with a view to making a medical recommendation; and
(b) it
appears to the Minister to be duly made under this Article.
(7) Where the guardianship
application names a person other than the Minister as guardian, it must also
include or be accompanied by a statement that the person so named consents to
act as guardian in relation to the patient.
(8) Where a form of
application under this Article is prescribed, an application must be made using
that form.
30 Effect
of application for guardianship
(1) A guardianship
application authorized by the Minister (a “guardianship
authorization”) shall be sufficient authority for the reception of the
patient into the guardianship of the person named as guardian in the
application.
(2) A guardianship
authorization shall confer on the person named as guardian, to the exclusion of
any other person, the power –
(a) subject
to paragraph (3), to require the patient to reside at a place specified by
the guardian;
(b) to
require the patient to attend at times and places so specified for the purpose
of treatment, occupation, education or training;
(c) to
require access to the patient to be given, at any place where the patient is
residing, to any registered medical practitioner, authorized officer or other
person so specified.
(3) Paragraphs (1) and
(2) are subject to the rights conferred on a patient by Article 50(1).
(4) For the avoidance of
doubt the words “the exclusion of any other person” in paragraph (2)
shall not have effect, where the Minister is the person named as guardian, to
exclude the exercise of powers under this Article by a person to whom the
Minister has lawfully delegated those powers.
(5) Where the person named
as guardian is the Minister, the Minister may (if considering that it is
justifiable in the circumstances to do so) require that the
patient –
(a) must
reside –
(i) in an approved
establishment, or
(ii) with
such person as the Minister may think fit;
(b) must
attend training specified by the Minister at such place and times or for such
periods as may be so specified.
(6) The States may by
Regulations make provision for –
(a) imposing
on guardians, in cases where the person named as guardian is not the Minister,
such duties as may be considered necessary or expedient in the interests of
patients subject to guardianship; and
(b) the
creation of offences, punishable by fines of up to level 3 on the standard
scale, for breach of such provision.
(7) Where, at any time
after a patient is received into guardianship, the application or any related
medical recommendation is found to be in any respect incorrect or defective –
(a) the
error or defect in question may, with the consent of the Minister, be rectified
by the applicant or (as the case may be) the person who signed the
recommendation; and
(b) the
application or recommendation shall have effect (and be deemed to have had
effect) as though made originally without the error or defect.
(8) Where a patient is
received into guardianship, any previous application under Part 3 or any
previous guardianship application in respect of the same patient shall cease to
have effect.
31 Powers
of re-taking into custody
(1) Where a patient who is
subject to guardianship and to a residence requirement under Article 30(2)(a)
or (5)(a)(i) absents himself or herself without the leave of the guardian from
the place at which he or she is required to reside, the patient may be taken
into custody and returned to that place by –
(a) the
guardian;
(b) a
person authorized in writing by the guardian to do so;
(c) a
police officer;
(d) an
authorized officer; or
(e) where
the place is an approved establishment, the managers of that establishment or
any member of staff of the establishment authorized by the managers for that
purpose.
(2) A patient shall not be
taken into custody under this Article after the expiration of the period of
6 months beginning with the first day of the patient’s absence
without leave, and a patient who has not returned nor been taken into custody
within that period shall, at the expiration of that period, cease to be subject
to guardianship.
32 Transfer
of guardianship and substitution of guardian
(1) The Minister may
arrange for the transfer of a patient received into guardianship under this
Part from the guardianship of any person (“G1”) into the
guardianship of any other person (“G2”), including the Minister.
(2) The Minister must arrange
for the transfer of a patient under paragraph (1) where it appears to the
Minister that any person appointed as a guardian under this Part has performed
that function negligently or in a manner contrary to the interests of the
patient.
(3) Where the power in paragraph (1)
is exercised, G2 shall be treated at all times and for all the purposes of this
Part as if G2 (and not G1) had been the person named in the guardianship
application as a result of which the patient was received into guardianship.
(4) If a person appointed
as a guardian under this Part becomes incapacitated by illness or any other
cause from so acting –
(a) the
Minister or any other person approved for the purpose may act as guardian of
the patient concerned during the guardian’s incapacity; and
(b) paragraph (3)
shall apply as if the person acting as guardian under this paragraph were G2.
(5) The States may by
Regulations make further provision as to the transfer of patients –
(a) between
guardianship and liability to detention in an approved establishment; and
(b) between
liability to detention in an approved establishment and guardianship.
(6) Without derogation from
the general power conferred by paragraph (5), Regulations under that
paragraph may in particular –
(a) prescribe
the circumstances in which, and the conditions subject to which, transfers
under those Regulations may take place;
(b) make
provision as to the application of this Part, and of Part 3, in respect of
patients transferred under those Regulations; and
(c) make provision
regulating the conveyance of patients transferred under those Regulations.
33 Duration
of guardianship
(1) A guardianship
authorization has effect for a period of 6 months beginning with the date
on which the application for guardianship is authorized under Article 30(1).
(2) A guardianship
authorization may be renewed in the manner provided by paragraphs (4) and
(5) –
(a) for
one further period of 6 months beginning immediately after the last day of
the period mentioned in paragraph (1); and
(b) thereafter
in the same manner for successive periods of 12 months.
(3) A patient who is
received into guardianship may apply to the Tribunal, once within each of the
periods mentioned in paragraphs (1) and (2), for a direction that the
guardianship authorization be terminated.
(4) Within the period of
2 months ending on the day on which, were it not for any renewal under
this Article, the guardianship authorization would cease to have effect, the
responsible medical officer must examine the patient and make a report to the
Minister, recommending –
(a) where
it appears to the responsible medical officer that in the interests of the
patient’s welfare or for the protection of other persons, the patient
should remain under guardianship, the renewal of the guardianship
authorization; or
(b) the
discharge of the patient from guardianship.
(5) Where a report under paragraph (4)
is provided in respect of a patient, the Minister must inform the patient and
the patient’s nearest person of the recommendations and the action
proposed to be taken and –
(a) where
the report contains a recommendation under paragraph (4)(a), the Minister
must renew the guardianship authorization for the appropriate period as
provided by paragraph (2); or
(b) where
the report contains a recommendation under paragraph (4)(b), the Minister
must discharge the patient.
Part 5
Other forms of legal custody: place of safety,
etc.
34 Interpretation
and application of Part 5
(1) In this
Part –
“convey” includes any other expression denoting removal
from one place to another;
“place of safety” means –
(a) an
approved establishment;
(b) in a
case where, for the purpose of preventing harm to the person in question or to
any other person, a police station is the most secure or suitable place, a
police station; and
(c) any
other place –
(i) which may be
designated as such for the purpose by the Minister, or
(ii) the
occupier of which consents to receive a person for a specified temporary
period;
“premises” includes any vessel, vehicle, aircraft or
hovercraft.
(2) Any person required or
authorized by virtue of this Law to be conveyed to any place or to be kept in
custody or detained in a place of safety, is deemed to be in legal custody
while being so conveyed, kept or detained.
(3) Nothing in this Part
shall prevent a person detained under Article 35 or 36 from being conveyed
from one place of safety to another.
35 Powers
of search, entry and removal of persons to place of safety
(1) Paragraph (2)
applies where it appears to the Bailiff, on information given on oath by an
authorized officer, that there is reasonable cause to suspect that a person
believed to be suffering from mental disorder –
(a) has
been, or is being, ill-treated, neglected or kept otherwise than under
detention or custody as provided by this Law, in any place; or
(b) being
unable to care for himself or herself, is living alone in any place.
(2) Where this paragraph
applies, and for the purpose stated in paragraph (3), the Bailiff may
issue a warrant authorizing –
(a) an
authorized officer; or
(b) a
person of any other category specified in the warrant,
to enter, if necessary by force, any premises specified in the
warrant and to search for and if necessary remove the person mentioned in paragraph (1)
to a place of safety.
(3) A person may be removed
to a place of safety in pursuance of a warrant issued under paragraph (2)
for the purpose of –
(a) making
an admission application in respect of the person under Part 3; or
(b) making
other arrangements for that person’s care or treatment.
(4) The exercise of the
power conferred by paragraph (3) may include, where appropriate,
assessment of the person for the purpose of an admission application, in the
place of safety or in any other premises, including the person’s home.
(5) Paragraph (6)
applies where it appears to the Bailiff, on information given on oath by an
authorized officer, that –
(a) there
is reasonable cause to believe that a patient who is liable to be detained or
taken or retaken into custody under this Law is to be found on certain
specified premises; and
(b) admission
to the premises has been or is likely to be refused.
(6) Where this paragraph
applies, the Bailiff may issue a warrant authorizing –
(a) the
authorized officer; and
(b) any
other person named in the warrant,
to enter, if necessary by force, any premises specified in the
warrant and to search for and if necessary remove the patient to a place of
safety.
(7) In the execution of a
warrant issued under this Article, the persons authorized by the
warrant –
(a) must
be accompanied by a registered medical practitioner; and
(b) may
be accompanied by a police officer.
(8) A person who is removed
to a place of safety under this Article may be detained there for a period not
exceeding 72 hours beginning with the admission of the person to that
place.
(9) It shall not be
necessary, in any information given or warrant issued under this Article, to
name or otherwise identify the person in respect of whom the information is
given or the warrant is issued, as the case may be.
36 Urgent
removal of persons found in public places
(1) Paragraph (2)
applies where a police officer finds, in any place other than a private
dwelling, a person who appears to the police officer –
(a) to be
suffering from mental disorder; and
(b) to be
in immediate need of care or control.
(2) Where this paragraph
applies, and the police officer thinks it necessary to do so in the interests
of that person or for the protection of other persons, the police officer may
remove the person to a place of safety.
(3) A person who is removed
to a place of safety under this Article may be detained there for a period not
exceeding 72 hours beginning with the admission of the person to that
place, for the purpose of making an admission application in respect of the person
under Part 3, or of making any other arrangements for the person’s
care or treatment.
37 Re-taking
of persons into custody
(1) This Article applies in
respect of persons who escape from legal custody.
(2) A person to whom this
Article applies (“A”) may be re-taken into custody, in accordance
with this Article –
(a) by
the person (“C”) who had custody of A immediately before A’s
escape;
(b) by a
police officer;
(c) by an
authorized officer;
(d) in a
case where, at the time of the escape A is a patient liable to be detained in
an approved establishment, by the managers of the establishment or a member of
staff of the establishment authorized for that purpose by the managers, as if A
were absent without leave in the terms of Article 25; or
(e) in a
case where at the time of the escape A is subject to guardianship and the time
limit imposed by Article 31(2) on re-taking such a person has not expired,
by any other person who would be entitled to take A into custody under Article 31(1),
as if A were absent without leave in the terms of that Article.
(3) Where A escapes while
being removed to or detained in a place of safety under Article 35 or 36,
A may not be re-taken after the expiry of the period –
(a) of
72 hours beginning with the time of the escape; or
(b) during
which the person is liable to be detained,
whichever expires first.
(4) Where A escapes from
custody while –
(a) being
conveyed to or from an approved establishment under Article 20(1); or
(b) in
custody or being conveyed to another place under Part 12,
this Article and Article 25 shall apply as though A were liable
to be detained in that establishment or place and, if A had not previously been
received into that establishment or place, as though A had been so received.
Part 6
Treatment requiring consent
38 Interpretation
and application of Part 6
(1) Subject to paragraph (2),
this Part applies in relation to a patient liable to be detained under this
Law, except a patient liable to be detained under Article 15 or 17 or
Part 4 or 5.
(2) Articles 40, 42 and
44 apply in relation to any patient, whether or not liable to be detained under
this Law.
(3) A second opinion
approved doctor or “SOAD” means a person who –
(a) is a registered
medical practitioner;
(b) has
such training and expertise in the field of psychiatry and in the application
of mental health legislation as may be prescribed; and
(c) is
approved by the Minister for the purpose of carrying out the functions of a
SOAD.
(4) In this Part, a
reference to treatment includes reference to a plan of treatment under which a
patient is to be given (whether within a specified period or otherwise) one or
more of the types of treatment listed in Article 40(2) or 41(2), as the
case may be.
39 Treatment
not requiring consent
The consent of a patient to whom this Part applies is not required
for any treatment given to the patient for the mental disorder from which the
patient is suffering, where the treatment –
(a) is not of a type listed
in Article 40(2) or 41(2); and
(b) is given by or under
the direction of the patient’s responsible medical officer.
40 Treatment
requiring both consent and a second opinion
(1) A treatment of a type
listed in paragraph (2) must not be given to a patient unless –
(a) the
patient has consented to the treatment; and
(b) a
SOAD has given a certificate in writing in accordance with paragraphs (3)
and (4).
(2) The types of treatment
mentioned in paragraph (1) are –
(a) any
surgical operation for destroying brain tissue or the functioning of brain
tissue;
(b) the
surgical implantation of hormones for reducing male sex drive;
(c) electro-convulsive
therapy; and
(d) such
other types of treatment as may be prescribed.
(3) A SOAD must not give a
certificate in writing as required by paragraph (1)(b) unless the SOAD has
consulted –
(a) the
patient’s responsible medical officer; and
(b) one
other person who must be an authorized officer or mental health professional
who, in either case, is or has been professionally concerned with the treatment
of the patient,
in accordance with any further provision made by a code of practice
as to such consultation.
(4) The certificate given
by the SOAD must state that, in the SOAD’s opinion and having consulted
as required by paragraph (3) –
(a) the
patient is capable of understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of
the proposed treatment and has consented to receive it; and
(b) it is
appropriate for the treatment to be given to that patient.
41 Treatment
requiring either consent or a second opinion
(1) A treatment of a type
listed in paragraph (2) must not be given to a patient unless either –
(a) the
patient has consented to the treatment, and –
(i) the
patient’s responsible medical officer, or
(ii) any
other approved practitioner,
has certified in writing that the patient is capable of
understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of the proposed treatment
and has consented to receive it;
or
(b) a
SOAD has given a certificate in writing in accordance with paragraphs (4)
and (5).
(2) The types of treatment
mentioned in paragraph (1) are –
(a) such
types as may be prescribed; and
(b) the
administration of medicine to a patient –
(i) by any means
(other than one set out in Article 40(2) or prescribed under sub-paragraph (a)),
(ii) at
any time during a period for which the patient is liable to be detained, if
3 months or more have elapsed since the first occasion in that period when
medicine was administered to the patient by any means,
for the purpose of treating the patient’s mental disorder.
(3) The number of months in
paragraph (2)(b)(ii) may be amended by Order of the Minister.
(4) A SOAD must not give a
certificate in writing as required by paragraph (1)(b) unless the SOAD has
consulted –
(a) the
patient’s responsible medical officer; and
(b) one other
person who must be an authorized officer or mental health professional who, in
either case, is or has been responsible for the treatment of the patient,
in accordance with any further provision made by a code of practice
as to such consultation.
(5) The certificate given
by the SOAD must state that, in the SOAD’s opinion and having consulted
as required by paragraph (4) –
(a) the
patient –
(i) is not capable of
understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of the proposed treatment,
or
(ii) has
not consented to receive it; but
(b) having
regard to the likelihood of the treatment alleviating or preventing a
deterioration of the patient’s condition, the treatment should be given
to that patient.
42 Withdrawal
of consent
(1) A patient who has consented
to treatment under Article 40 or 41 may withdraw that consent at any time,
whether or not the treatment has been completed.
(2) Following withdrawal of
consent, Articles 40 and 41 shall apply afresh to any treatment remaining
to be given, as if that treatment were a separate treatment.
43 Duration
of certificates
(1) A certificate given as
required by Article 40(1)(b) or 41(1) shall cease to have effect at the
end of the period of 6 months beginning with the date of the certificate,
or such shorter period as may be specified by the SOAD in the certificate.
(2) Once a certificate has
so ceased to have effect, Articles 40 and 41 shall apply afresh in
relation to any treatment of a type listed in those Articles, as if no
certificate had previously been given.
44 Emergency
treatment
(1) A requirement for
consent imposed by Article 40 or 41 shall not apply in relation to any
treatment which –
(a) is
immediately necessary to save a patient’s life;
(b) is
not irreversible and is immediately necessary to prevent a serious
deterioration of a patient’s condition;
(c) is
not irreversible or hazardous and is immediately necessary to alleviate serious
suffering by the patient; or
(d) is
not irreversible or hazardous, is immediately necessary and represents the minimum
interference necessary to prevent a patient behaving violently or being a
danger to himself or herself or to others.
(2) Articles 41 and
43(2) shall not apply to preclude continuation of any treatment, pending
compliance with Article 40 or 41, if the responsible medical officer
considers that discontinuity of treatment would cause serious suffering to a
patient.
(3) For the purposes of
this Article, treatment is “irreversible” if it has unfavourable
and permanent physical or psychological consequences, and
“hazardous” if it entails significant physical hazard.
45 Examinations,
records etc. for the purposes of this Part
(1) An approved
practitioner or SOAD may, for the purpose of exercising functions under this
Part, at any reasonable time –
(a) visit,
interview or examine a patient in private; and
(b) require
the production of, and inspect, records relating to the treatment of that
patient.
(2) A certificate given for
the purposes of this Part shall be in such form as may be prescribed, and an
approved practitioner or SOAD giving such a certificate must –
(a) keep
a record of the certificate, including the date of its issue; and
(b) provide
a copy of the certificate to the patient’s responsible medical officer.
46 Regulations
as to consent to treatment
(1) The States may by
Regulations make further provision as to the application of this Part.
(2) In particular and
without derogation from the generality of the power conferred by paragraph (1) –
(a) provision
may be made by such Regulations as to –
(i) the administration
of electro-convulsive therapy or of such other types of treatment as may be
specified, and
(ii) the
circumstances in which any treatment may be administered to a child or to a
person incapable of giving consent;
and
(b) such
Regulations may disapply Article 6(3) of the Capacity Law.
Part 7
Mental Health Review Tribunal
47 Establishment
of Panel and appointment of qualified persons
(1) The Bailiff shall
appoint (in accordance with this Article) and maintain (in accordance with Article 48)
a Mental Health Review Tribunal Panel (the “Panel”) from which the
members of a Mental Health Review Tribunal convened to carry out any of the
Tribunal’s functions shall be drawn (in accordance with Article 49
and the Schedule).
(2) The Panel shall consist
of such number of qualified persons as in the Bailiff’s opinion is
necessary for the purpose of carrying out the Tribunal’s functions under
this Part and the Schedule.
(3) For the purposes of
paragraph (2), a qualified person is one who fulfils the requirements of
paragraph (4) and –
(a) is
legally qualified by virtue of being an advocate or solicitor of the Royal
Court of not less than 5 years’ standing (a “legal
member”);
(b) is
medically qualified by virtue of being an approved practitioner or a practitioner
of equivalent experience and qualification registered as such in a jurisdiction
other than Jersey (a “medical member”); or
(c) is
otherwise qualified by virtue of his or her experience in administration or
application of mental health legislation, or his or her knowledge of social
services, or of such other qualification as the Bailiff considers suitable (a
“lay member”).
(4) Qualified persons shall
be persons –
(a) who,
in the Bailiff’s opinion, have sufficient experience and knowledge to
enable them to determine matters falling to be determined by the Tribunal in
the exercise of its functions; and
(b) who
are not disqualified –
(i) in the case of a
person otherwise legally qualified, by falling within any of the descriptions
listed in paragraph (5), or
(ii) in
the case of a person otherwise medically qualified or qualified as a lay
member, by virtue of being an advocate or solicitor of the Royal Court, or by
falling within the description in paragraph (5)(a) or (b).
(5) The following are the
descriptions of persons disqualified as mentioned in paragraph (4) –
(a) the
Bailiff, the Deputy Bailiff or a Jurat;
(b) any
other member of the States of Jersey;
(c) any
person holding a paid office under the Crown or the States, any employee of the
Crown or any States’ employee (as defined by Article 2 of the Employment of States of
Jersey Employees (Jersey) Law 2005);
(d) any
person providing services, whether directly or indirectly, to the Minister or
the States in relation to the exercise of any function of the Minister or the
States under this Law.
(6) The Minister shall
establish and pay rates of remuneration of persons appointed under this Article
and may defray such expenses of those persons as the Minister may determine.
(7) The Minister may
provide, from any administration of the States for which he or she is assigned
responsibility, such officers, servants, and accommodation, as the Tribunal may
reasonably require.
48 Term
of office etc. of qualified persons
(1) The Bailiff may review
the constitution of the Panel and may –
(a) appoint
additional persons;
(b) re-appoint
existing qualified persons; or
(c) remove
qualified persons from office on the grounds set out in paragraph (2),
as the Bailiff thinks fit.
(2) The Bailiff may remove
from the Panel any qualified person –
(a) on
the ground of misconduct by that person; or
(b) where
that person is incapable of fulfilling the functions of a member of the
Tribunal by reason of mental disorder or physical incapability.
(3) Subject to paragraph (2),
the appointment of a qualified person shall cease on whichever of the following
occasions is the first to occur –
(a) the
appointment or election of that person to a position which would disqualify him
or her under Article 47(5)(a) or (b);
(b) at
midnight on 31st December in the fifth year following the year of appointment;
(c) at
midnight on 31st December immediately following the member’s 72nd
birthday;
(d) if
the person tenders his or her resignation in writing to the Bailiff;
(e) if
the person becomes bankrupt;
(f) if,
without reasonable excuse, the person absents himself or herself from a sitting
of the Tribunal at which the member is appointed to attend in accordance with
Part 1 of the Schedule.
(4) Where there is or is
discovered to have been any defect with regard to the qualifications of a
person, nothing in this Article or Article 47 shall be taken to invalidate
a decision or any proceedings of a Tribunal of which that person is or was a
member.
49 Establishment
and constitution of Tribunal
(1) From among the legal
members the Bailiff shall appoint a Chairman, Vice Chairman and such number of
members as the Bailiff considers necessary properly to discharge the functions
of the Tribunal.
(2) Part 1 of the
Schedule has effect with respect to the constitution and procedures of the
Tribunal.
(3) The States may by
Regulations amend Part 1 of the Schedule.
50 Principal
functions of the Tribunal
(1) A patient, a
patient’s nearest person, or other applicant may apply to the Tribunal
for the review of a decision directly affecting the patient and of a kind
described in the table in Part 2 of the Schedule.
(2) The principal functions
of the Tribunal shall be to determine –
(a) applications
made under this Article and in accordance with Part 2 of the Schedule; and
(b) references
made by the Minister or the Attorney General under Article 51.
(3) The Tribunal shall also
discharge such other functions as are conferred upon it by or under this Law or
by any other enactment.
(4) In paragraph (1)
“applicant” includes any person (not being a patient or the
patient’s nearest person) mentioned in the second column of the table in
Part 2 of the Schedule.
51 Reference
to Tribunal by Minister or Attorney General
Where a patient is liable to be detained under Part 3 or is
subject to guardianship under Part 4, the Minister or the Attorney General
may, if he or she thinks fit, refer that patient’s case to the Tribunal
and the Tribunal shall deal with any such reference as if it were an
application by the patient made under Article 50.
52 Directions
which may be given by the Tribunal
(1) Where the application
before the Tribunal concerns a patient admitted for assessment, the Tribunal
may in any case direct that the patient be discharged, and shall so direct
unless the Tribunal is satisfied that –
(a) the
patient is then suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree which
warrants the patient’s detention in an approved establishment for
assessment (or for assessment followed by treatment) for at least a limited
period; and
(b) it is
necessary that the patient should continue to be detained –
(i) in the interests
of the patient’s health or safety, or
(ii) for
the protection of other persons.
(2) Where the application
before the Tribunal concerns a patient admitted for treatment, the Tribunal may
in any case direct that the patient be discharged, and shall so direct unless
the Tribunal is satisfied that –
(a) the
patient is then suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree which
warrants the patient’s detention in an approved establishment for
treatment; and
(b) it is
necessary that the patient should continue to be detained –
(i) in the interests
of the patient’s health or safety, or
(ii) for
the protection of other persons.
(3) Where the application
before the Tribunal concerns a patient subject to guardianship, the Tribunal
may in any case direct that the patient be discharged, and shall so direct
unless the Tribunal is satisfied that –
(a) the
patient is then suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree which
warrants the reception of the patient into guardianship; and
(b) it is
necessary for the patient to continue to be subject to guardianship –
(i) for the
patient’s welfare, or
(ii) for
the protection of other persons.
(4) In the exercise of its
powers under paragraphs (1) to (3) the Tribunal may direct the discharge
of a patient on a future date specified in the direction.
53 Visiting
and examination of patients
(1) A person entitled under
Article 50 or 51 to apply to the Tribunal may authorize a registered
medical practitioner to visit the patient at any reasonable time and examine
the patient in private, for the purpose of –
(a) advising
whether an application to the Tribunal should be made by or in respect of the
patient; or
(b) providing
information as to the patient’s condition for the purposes of such an
application.
(2) A registered medical
practitioner authorized under paragraph (1) may require the production of
and inspect any documents constituting, or alleged to constitute, the
authorization for detention of the patient under Part 2, and any records
or other documents relating to the patient’s treatment.
54 Appeals
from Tribunal
(1) A person aggrieved by a
decision of the Tribunal may appeal to the Court on a point of law.
(2) The power to make rules
of court under the Royal Court (Jersey)
Law 1948 shall extend to making rules for the purpose of the conduct of, and
proceedings in, appeals under paragraph (1).
(3) On an appeal under paragraph (1)
the Court may –
(a) quash
the decision of the Tribunal;
(b) affirm
the decision of the Tribunal;
(c) give
any direction which the Tribunal has power to give; or
(d) refer
the matter back to the Tribunal for reconsideration.
(4) No decision of the
Tribunal shall be invalidated solely by reason of procedural irregularity,
unless that irregularity was such as to prevent a party to the appeal from
presenting his or her case fairly before the Tribunal.
Part 8
Criminal justice: incapacity of defendant
55 Application
and interpretation of Part 8
(1) This Part applies where
in any proceedings, whether on accusation or trial, it appears to the court
that a person charged with any act (the “defendant”) is, because of –
(a) mental
disorder; or
(b) inability
to communicate,
incapable of participating effectively in the proceedings, and any
reference in this Part to incapacity shall be construed accordingly.
(2) For the purposes of
this Part –
(a) a
reference to the “court” is to whichever court has jurisdiction, in
a particular case, to try the proceedings in question, and includes (for the
avoidance of doubt) the Magistrate’s Court, the Youth Court, or the Royal
Court, as the case may be;
(b) a
reference to “medical evidence” is to the evidence, in relation to
a particular matter, of at least 2 registered medical practitioners who, in the
opinion of the court, have appropriate experience in the diagnosis or treatment
of such a matter;
(c) “participating
effectively” includes, but is not limited to –
(i) entering a plea,
and
(ii) understanding
the nature and significance of the proceedings or any stage of the proceedings;
and
(d) “special
measures” may include, but are not limited to, the provision of
translators or interpreters or of mechanical or electronic aids to hearing or
understanding.
56 Power
to adjourn proceedings where defendant apparently incapable
(1) Where it appears to the
court that a defendant is incapable of participating effectively in
proceedings, the court may adjourn the proceedings to enable determination of
the issue of the defendant’s incapacity.
(2) Subject to paragraph (3),
the determination of that issue –
(a) shall
be held as soon as possible and at such time and place as the court may direct;
and
(b) may
be held in the absence of the defendant if, having regard to the medical
evidence, it is impracticable or inappropriate to bring the defendant before
the court.
(3) Where the court
considers that it is expedient and in the interests of the defendant to do so,
the court may postpone consideration of the issue of incapacity until any time
up to the opening of the case for the defence (and if, before the issue falls
to be determined, the defendant is acquitted, the issue need not be
determined).
57 Determining
issue of incapacity
(1) The court determining
an issue as to the defendant’s incapacity shall have regard (so far as
each of the following factors is relevant in the particular case) to the
ability of the defendant –
(a) to
understand the nature of the proceedings so as to be able to instruct his or
her lawyer and to make a proper defence;
(b) to
understand the nature and substance of the evidence;
(c) to
give evidence on his or her own behalf;
(d) to
make rational decisions in relation to his or her participation in the
proceedings (including entering any plea) which reflect true and informed
choices on his or her part.
(2) The issue as to the
defendant’s incapacity shall be determined on the balance of
probabilities.
(3) For the purpose of
determining the issue of incapacity –
(a) the
court must obtain, and have regard to, medical evidence on that issue; and
(b) the
court shall have all such powers to make orders in respect of the defendant
under this Part as it has in respect of a defendant under Articles 61(1)
and 62(1).
(4) Where the court
determines that the defendant is incapable but considers that the defendant’s
incapacity might be alleviated by special measures to enable the defendant to
participate effectively in the proceedings –
(a) the
court shall have regard to whether it is practicable to put in place such
special measures; and
(b) if
the court considers it is practicable to do so, shall direct that such special
measures are put in place.
58 Result
of finding of incapacity
(1) This Article applies
where, on the hearing of an issue as to a defendant’s incapacity, the
court determines that the defendant is incapable (even if special measures were
to be put in place) of participating effectively in proceedings.
(2) Where this Article
applies, the court –
(a) may
adjourn the proceedings for a further specified period of no more than 6 months,
for the purpose of enabling the defendant to receive treatment; and
(b) if it
does so, may do anything which it has power to do under Article 63.
(3) Where this Article
applies and –
(a) the
court does not adjourn the proceedings under paragraph (2); but
(b) the
court is satisfied, having regard to the medical evidence, that the defendant
is and will remain (so far as reasonably foreseeable) incapable of
participating effectively in proceedings,
the proceedings adjourned under Article 56(1) shall not proceed
further and the court may deal with the defendant only –
(i) by
releasing him or her unconditionally; or
(ii) as
provided by Article 59.
(4) The States may by
Regulations amend the maximum period, in paragraph (2)(a), for which
proceedings may be adjourned under that paragraph.
59 Final
orders where defendant incapable
(1) This Article applies
where Article 58 applies and where, having regard to the interests of
justice and to –
(a) the
evidence already given, and such further evidence as may be given, for the
purpose of determining whether the defendant did the act with which he or she
is charged; and
(b) any
further matters as to which provision is made by Regulations under paragraph (3),
the court finds that the defendant did in fact do the act with which
he or she is charged.
(2) Where this Article
applies, the court may make in respect of the defendant –
(a) a
treatment order (with or without restriction) under Article 65;
(b) a
guardianship order under Article 66; and
(c) such
further orders as the States may by Regulations provide or specify.
(3) The States may by
Regulations make further provision as to the scope and exercise of the
court’s discretion under this Article, and in particular (but without
derogation) may make provision as to –
(a) facts
or matters which must be proved to the court, and the standard of proof;
(b) the
nature of evidence to be given, the persons who may give evidence, and the
procedures which must be followed, for the purpose mentioned in paragraph (1)(a);
and
(c) such
other matters as the court must take into account.
Part 9
Criminal justice: powers of court in relation
to accused persons suffering mental disorder
60 Interpretation
and application of Part 9
(1) In this Part –
(a) a
reference to the “court” –
(i) in Articles 61
to 63, has the same meaning as in Part 8,
(ii) in
Articles 64 to 66, is to the Magistrates’ Court or the Royal Court,
(iii) in
Articles 67 to 69, is to the Royal Court only;
(b) a
reference to an offence punishable with imprisonment includes reference to an
offence for which a person under 21 years of age may be sentenced to youth
detention under the Criminal Justice (Young Offenders)
(Jersey) Law 2014 (the “Young Offenders Law”); and
(ba) a reference to a
sentence of imprisonment includes reference to a sentence of youth detention
under the Young Offenders Law;
(c) “place
of safety” has the meaning given to that expression by Part 5, but
also includes (without qualification) the prison or secure accommodation;
“prison” has the meaning given by Article 1(1) of
the Prison (Jersey) Law 1957;
“secure accommodation” has the meaning given by Article
1(1) of the Children (Jersey) Law 2002.[2]
(2) The powers conferred by
Articles 61 to 63 may be exercised in relation to a defendant who –
(a) is
not subject to any order made by any court requiring the person’s
detention in custody, but is awaiting proceedings before a court for an offence
punishable by that court with imprisonment; or
(b) has
been convicted by the court of any offence punishable with imprisonment.
(3) The powers conferred by
Articles 64 to 66 may be exercised in relation to a defendant who is
convicted by the court of an offence punishable with imprisonment, the sentence
for which is not fixed by law.
(4) The powers conferred by
Article 67 may be exercised in relation to a defendant who is convicted by
the court of an offence punishable with imprisonment, the sentence for which is
fixed by law.
(5) Article 72 may
apply in relation to any defendant.
(6) Where a court makes an
order in exercise of its functions under Articles 62 to 65 or 71(3) –
(a) the
court may further and additionally order that the defendant be conveyed to the
approved establishment in question within a period of 7 days beginning
with the making of the order;
(b) the
managers of that establishment shall admit the defendant within that period and
detain the defendant in accordance with the relevant provisions of this Part; and
(c) unless
the court orders otherwise, the provisions of Article 25 shall apply in
relation to a person detained under this Part as they apply in relation to a
person liable to be detained under Part 3.
61 Remand
on bail for report
(1) A court may remand the
defendant on bail for the purpose of obtaining a report on the
defendant’s mental condition and in doing so may order that the person
attend at an approved establishment, at such times and upon such conditions as
the court may specify, to enable the preparation of such a report.
(2) If a defendant remanded
under paragraph (1) fails to comply with the order, the defendant may be
arrested without warrant by any police officer and after being arrested shall
be brought as soon as possible before the court which remanded the defendant.
(3) The court may deal with
a defendant brought before it under paragraph (2) in any way in which a
court could have dealt with him or her if that defendant had not been remanded
under this Article.
62 Remand
to approved establishment for report
(1) Where the court is
satisfied of the matters specified in paragraph (2) and is of the
opinion –
(a) that
the defendant would not comply with an order under Article 61; or
(b) that
if the defendant were remanded on bail under that Article, it would otherwise
be impracticable for a report to be prepared on the defendant’s mental
condition,
the court may remand a defendant to a specified approved
establishment for the purpose of obtaining such a report.
(2) The power conferred by
paragraph (1) may not be exercised unless the court is
satisfied –
(a) on
the written or oral evidence of 2 registered medical practitioners, at least
one of whom is an approved practitioner, that there is reason to suspect that
the defendant is suffering from mental disorder; and
(b) on
the written or oral evidence of the approved practitioner who would be
responsible for making the report, or some other person representing the
managers of the approved establishment in question, that arrangements have been
made for the admission of the defendant to that establishment within
7 days of the date of the order,
and if the court is so satisfied it may give directions for the
conveyance and admission of the defendant to the establishment, and for his or
her detention in the establishment or in a place of safety pending the
admission.
(3) If it appears to the court
which remanded a defendant under this Article that, on the written or oral
evidence of the approved practitioner responsible for making the report, a
further remand is necessary for completing the assessment of the
defendant’s mental condition, the court may further remand the
defendant –
(a) having
regard to the limits on such further remand in paragraph (4); and
(b) without
the defendant’s being brought before the court, if the defendant is
represented by an MHA who is given an opportunity to be heard.
(4) A defendant shall not
be remanded or further remanded under this Article for more than 28 days
at a time or for more than 26 weeks in all, and the court may at any time
terminate the remand if it appears appropriate to the court to do so.
(5) A defendant remanded
under this Article is entitled –
(a) to
obtain, at his or her own expense, an independent report from a medical
practitioner chosen by the defendant; and
(b) on
the basis of any such report, to apply to the court for the remand to be terminated.
(6) If a defendant remanded
under this Article absconds from the approved establishment or while being
conveyed to or from that establishment or any place of safety, the defendant
may be arrested without warrant by any police officer and after being arrested
shall be brought as soon as possible before the court which remanded the
defendant.
(7) The court may deal with
a defendant brought before it under paragraph (6) in any way in which a
court could have dealt with him or her if that defendant had not been remanded
under this Article.
63 Remand
to approved establishment for treatment
(1) A court may remand a
defendant to a specified approved establishment for the purpose of treatment.
(2) The power conferred by
paragraph (1) may not be exercised unless the court is
satisfied –
(a) on
the written or oral evidence of 2 registered medical practitioners, at least
one of whom is an approved practitioner, that there is reason to suspect that
the defendant is suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree which
makes it appropriate for the defendant to be detained in an approved
establishment for treatment; and
(b) on
the written or oral evidence of the responsible medical officer, or some other
person representing the managers of the approved establishment in question,
that arrangements have been made for the admission of the defendant to that
establishment within 7 days of the date of the order,
and if the court is so satisfied it may give directions for the
conveyance and admission of the defendant to the establishment, and for his or
her detention in the establishment or in a place of safety pending the
admission.
(3) If it appears to the
court which remanded a defendant under this Article that, on the written or
oral evidence of the approved practitioner responsible for making the report, a
further remand is necessary for completing the defendant’s treatment, the
court may further remand that person –
(a) having
regard to the limits on such further remand in Article 62(4) as applied by
paragraph (4); and
(b) without
the defendant’s being brought before the court, if the defendant is
represented by an MHA who is given an opportunity to be heard.
(4) Paragraphs (4) to
(7) of Article 62 shall have effect as though a remand under this Article
were a remand under Article 62.
64 Interim
orders
(1) A court may order a
defendant to be admitted to and detained in a specified approved establishment
for the purpose of assessment of –
(a) the
nature and degree of any mental disorder suffered by the defendant; and
(b) the
advisability, having regard to such assessment, of making a treatment order in
respect of the defendant under Article 65.
(2) The power conferred by
paragraph (1) may not be exercised unless the court is
satisfied –
(a) on
the written or oral evidence of 2 registered medical practitioners, at least
one of whom is an approved practitioner, that there is reason to suspect that
the defendant is suffering from mental disorder such as may warrant the making
of a treatment order under Article 65 in respect of the person;
(b) on
the written or oral evidence of the responsible medical officer, or some other
person representing the managers of the approved establishment in question,
that arrangements have been made for the admission of the defendant to that
establishment within 7 days of the date of the order,
and if the court is so satisfied it may give directions for the
conveyance and admission of the defendant to the establishment, and for his or
her detention in the establishment or in a place of safety pending the
admission.
(3) The court making or
renewing an order under this Article shall specify the period of detention
which shall be –
(a) on
the order being first made, no more than 12 weeks;
(b) on
any subsequent renewal of the order, no more than 28 days at a time; and
(c) for
no more than 26 weeks in all,
and the court may at any time revoke an order under this Article if
it appears appropriate to the court to do so.
(4) Where it appears to the
court which ordered the detention of a defendant under this Article that, on
the written or oral evidence of the responsible medical officer, a period of
further detention is warranted, the court may –
(a) renew
the order, having regard to the limits on such renewal in paragraph (3);
or
(b) make
a treatment order under Article 65 in respect of the defendant,
and in either case may do so without the defendant’s being
brought before the court, if the defendant is represented by an MHA who is
given an opportunity to be heard.
(5) An order made or
renewed under this Article shall cease to have effect if –
(a) the
court makes a treatment order under Article 65 in respect of the accused
person; or
(b) the
court decides, on the written or oral evidence of the responsible medical
officer, to deal with the defendant in some other way.
(6) Where –
(a) the
court gives a direction for the conveyance of the defendant such as mentioned
in paragraph (2); and
(b) the
defendant absconds while being conveyed to or from an approved establishment or
any place of safety,
the defendant may be arrested without warrant by any police officer
and after being arrested shall be brought as soon as possible before the court
which ordered the detention of that person.
(7) The court may deal with
a defendant brought before it under paragraph (6) in any way in which a
court could have dealt with that defendant if that defendant had not been
detained under this Article.
65 Treatment
orders
(1) A court may order that
the defendant be admitted to and detained in a specified approved establishment
for treatment, where –
(a) the
court is satisfied, on the evidence of 2 medical practitioners, at least one of
whom is an approved practitioner, that –
(i) the defendant is
suffering mental disorder of a nature or degree that warrants admission to and
detention in an approved establishment for treatment, and
(ii) the
treatment cannot be given to the defendant without such admission and
detention;
(b) the
court is of the opinion, having regard to all the circumstances including (but
without limitation) the nature of the offence and the defendant’s
character and antecedents, and to other methods of dealing with the defendant,
that an order under this Article (a “treatment order”) is the most
suitable method of disposing of the case; and
(c) the
court is satisfied, on the written or oral evidence of the approved
practitioner or some other person representing the managers of the approved
establishment in question, that arrangements have been made for the admission
of the defendant to that establishment within 7 days of the date of the
order.
(2) Evidence under
paragraph (1)(a) –
(a) must
be given in writing signed by the practitioners who have personally examined
the defendant either jointly or, if separately, at an interval of not more than
5 days; and
(b) must
specify the form of mental disorder from which the defendant is found to be
suffering.
(3) Where a treatment order
is made in respect of a defendant –
(a) the
defendant shall be conveyed to the specified approved establishment within the
period of 7 days beginning with the date of the order, and in accordance
with any directions which may be given by the court for that purpose;
(b) the
managers of the establishment shall admit the defendant and thereafter detain
and deal with the defendant as a patient in respect of whom a treatment
authorization had been made under Part 3; and
(c) the
court may not pass sentence of imprisonment, impose a fine or make a probation
order in respect of the offence for which the defendant is convicted, but may
make any other order which the court has power to make apart from this
provision.
66 Guardianship
orders
(1) A court may order that
the defendant be received into guardianship, where –
(a) the
court is satisfied, on the evidence of 2 medical practitioners, at least one of
whom is an approved practitioner, that the defendant is suffering mental
disorder of a nature or degree that warrants reception into guardianship;
(b) the
court is of the opinion, having regard to all the circumstances including (but
without limitation) the nature of the offence and the defendant’s
character and antecedents, and to other methods of dealing with the defendant,
that an order under this Article (a “guardianship order”) is
the most suitable method of disposing of the case; and
(c) the
court is satisfied that the authority or person, who would be appointed as
guardian by the order, consents to act as guardian in relation to the
defendant.
(2) Evidence under
paragraph (1)(a) –
(a) must
be given in writing signed by the practitioners who have personally examined
the defendant either jointly or, if separately, at an interval of not more than
5 days; and
(b) must
specify the form of mental disorder from which the defendant is found to be
suffering.
(3) Where a guardianship
order is made in respect of a defendant –
(a) Part 4
shall apply as though a guardianship authorization had been made in respect of
the defendant under that Part; and
(b) the
court may not pass sentence of imprisonment, impose a fine or make a probation
order in respect of the offence for which the defendant is convicted, but may
make any other order which the court has power to make apart from this
provision.
67 Directions
where sentence of imprisonment to be served in approved establishment
(1) A court may impose any
sentence of imprisonment which it has power to impose in respect of the offence
in question, and in addition to that sentence may give one or more directions
such as are specified in paragraph (3), where the court is satisfied –
(a) on
the evidence of 2 medical practitioners, at least one of whom is an approved
practitioner, that –
(i) the defendant is
suffering mental disorder of a nature or degree that warrants admission to and
detention in an approved establishment for treatment, and
(ii) appropriate
treatment is available for that defendant in that establishment; and
(b) on
the written or oral evidence of the responsible medical officer or some other
person representing the managers of the approved establishment in question,
that arrangements have been made for the admission of the defendant to that
establishment within 28 days of the date of the directions.
(2) If the court is
satisfied as described in paragraph (1)(b), the court may give such
further directions as it thinks fit for the conveyance of the defendant to, and
the detention of the defendant in, the establishment or a place of safety
pending admission to the establishment.
(3) The directions
mentioned in paragraph (1) are that –
(a) the
defendant may, instead of being removed to and detained in a prison, be removed
to and detained in a specified approved establishment; and
(b) discharge
of the defendant from the approved establishment shall be subject to such restrictions
as may be specified.
(4) If, within the period
of 28 days mentioned in paragraph (1)(b), it appears to the Minister
that by reason of an emergency or other special circumstances it is not
practicable for the defendant to be admitted to the specified approved
establishment, the Minister may direct the admission of the defendant to such
other approved establishment as appears to the Minister to be appropriate.
(5) Where the Minister
gives a direction under paragraph (4), the Minister must provide a copy of
the direction to the court and any person having custody for the time being of
the defendant.
(6) Directions given by the
court under paragraph (2) or by the Minister under paragraph (4)
shall be sufficient authority for –
(a) a
police officer or any other person directed to do so to convey the defendant to
the approved establishment in question; and
(b) the
managers of the establishment to admit the defendant and subsequently deal with
the defendant in accordance with this Law.
(7) A prisoner whose
sentence of imprisonment has not expired may be discharged from the approved
establishment to which he or she has been transferred under this Article –
(a) on an
application made to the court by –
(i) the prisoner, or
(ii) the
Attorney General;
(b) on
the grounds that, in the opinion of the responsible medical officer, it is no
longer necessary for the prisoner to be detained in such an establishment by
reason of mental disorder.
(8) Where paragraph (7)
applies, the prisoner shall be conveyed to prison in accordance with any further
directions given by the court for that purpose, and the Governor of the prison
shall admit the prisoner and deal with him or her as if paragraphs (1) to
(6) of this Article had not applied.
68 Special
restrictions on treatment orders
(1) Where a treatment order
is made in respect of a defendant and it appears to the court, having regard to
the matters in paragraph (2), that it is necessary to do so to protect the
public from serious harm, the court may further order that the treatment order
shall take effect only with special restrictions, either without limit of time
or during such period as the court may specify.
(2) The matters mentioned
in paragraph (1) as those to which the court must have regard
are –
(a) the
nature and gravity of the offence;
(b) the
antecedents of the defendant;
(c) the
risk of the defendant committing further offences if the defendant remains at
liberty.
(3) A further order under
paragraph (1) (a “restriction order”) shall not be made unless
at least one of the practitioners giving evidence for the purposes of Article 65(1)(a)
has given evidence orally before the court.
(4) Where a restriction
order is made in respect of a defendant –
(a) the
defendant shall be conveyed to the specified approved establishment within the
period of 7 days beginning with the date of the order and in accordance
with any directions given by the court for that purpose;
(b) the
managers of the establishment shall admit the defendant and thereafter detain
and deal with the defendant as a patient in respect of whom a treatment
authorization had been made under Part 3, except that –
(i) leave of absence
under Article 24 shall not be granted nor the defendant be transferred
under Article 26 without leave of the court, and
(ii) Article 27(1)
to (5) shall not apply unless and until the restriction order ceases to have
effect in accordance with paragraph (5).
(5) A restriction order
shall not cease to have effect unless the court is satisfied, on an application
made for the purpose by –
(a) the
defendant, or the defendant’s nearest person appointed or nominated under
Part 2; or
(b) pursuant
to a report under paragraph (6), the Attorney General,
that restrictions in respect of the defendant are no longer required
to protect the public from serious harm.
(6) During the period for
which a restriction order remains in effect, the responsible medical officer
must –
(a) examine
the defendant at such intervals (not exceeding 12 months) as the court may
direct; and
(b) make
a report of each such examination to the Attorney General,
containing –
(i) the responsible
medical officer’s opinion as to whether the restriction order should
continue in effect, and
(ii) such
further particulars as the court may require.
69 Transfer
and detention orders[3]
(1) This Article applies in
respect of a person detained in prison or secure accommodation.
(2) The court may order the
transfer of a person from prison or secure accommodation to an approved
establishment, and the detention of the person in that establishment for an
initial period of 6 months (a “transfer and detention order”)
if the court is satisfied –
(a) on the evidence of 2 registered medical
practitioners, at least one of whom must be an approved practitioner, that the
person is suffering from a mental disorder of a nature
or degree that makes it appropriate for the person to be detained in an
approved establishment for treatment;
(b) that the person should be transferred and
detained in the public interest; and
(c) on the written or oral evidence of the
approved practitioner responsible for giving the evidence under
sub-paragraph (a), or another person representing the managers of the
approved establishment, that arrangements have been made to admit the person to
that establishment within the period of 7 days beginning with the date of
the order.
(3) Evidence under
paragraph (2)(a) –
(a) must be given in writing signed by the
practitioners who have personally examined the person either jointly or, if
separately, at an interval of not more than 5 days; and
(b) must specify the form of mental disorder
from which the person is found to be suffering.
(4) In an emergency, the
court may waive the requirement for written evidence under paragraph (3)(a)
and the evidence may be given orally.
(5) If the court makes a
transfer and detention order in respect of a person –
(a) the person must be taken to the approved
establishment within the period of 7 days
beginning with the date of the order and in accordance with any directions
given by the court for that purpose;
(b) the person’s initial 6-month period of
detention (the “initial period”), begins with
the date of the order; and
(c) the managers of the
approved establishment must admit the person and detain them until one of the
following occurs –
(i) the initial
period expires,
(ii) the
person’s sentence of imprisonment expires, or
(iii) the
court orders the person’s discharge from the approved establishment under
paragraph (12).
(6) The initial period may
be renewed for one further period of 6 months and then for successive
periods of 12 months.
(7) Any application to
renew a period of detention must be made to the court by the Attorney General
on the grounds that, in the opinion of the responsible medical
officer –
(a) the person is suffering from mental disorder
of a nature or degree that makes it appropriate for them to be detained in an
approved establishment for treatment; and
(b) the person should continue to be detained in
the public interest.
(8) A renewed period of
detention begins immediately after the previous period expires.
(9) The managers of the
approved establishment must continue to detain a person who is the subject of a
renewed period of detention until one of the following occurs –
(a) the
renewed period expires;
(b) the
person’s sentence of imprisonment expires; or
(c) the
court orders the person’s discharge from the approved establishment under
paragraph (12).
(10) A person whose sentence of
imprisonment has not expired may be discharged from the approved establishment
to which they have been transferred, on an application made to the
court –
(a) by that person; or
(b) by the Attorney General.
(11) An application under
paragraph (10) must be made on the ground that, in the opinion of the
responsible medical officer, it is no longer necessary for the person to be
detained in an approved establishment for treatment.
(12) If, further to an application
under paragraph (10), the court orders the person’s
discharge from the approved establishment, the person must be taken to prison
or secure accommodation in accordance with any directions given by the court
for that purpose.
(13) The person taken to prison or
secure accommodation under paragraph (12) must be –
(a) admitted
by the prison Governor or person responsible for managing the secure
accommodation; and
(b) dealt
with as if no transfer and detention order had been made in respect of that
person.
70 Special
provisions where patient sentenced to imprisonment
(1) Paragraph (2)
applies where a patient who –
(a) is
liable to be detained by virtue of an assessment authorization or treatment
authorization; or
(b) is
subject to guardianship by virtue of a guardianship authorization,
is detained in custody, pursuant to an order or sentence of any
court in Jersey, for a period (or successive periods in the aggregate)
exceeding 6 months.
(2) Where this paragraph
applies, the application mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) shall cease
to have effect at the end of the period mentioned in that paragraph.
(3) Where a patient to whom
paragraph (1)(a) or (b) applies is detained in custody, but the
application in question does not cease to have effect under paragraph (2) –
(a) if
(apart from this paragraph) the patient would cease to be liable to be detained
or to be subject to guardianship on or before the day on which the patient is
discharged from custody, the patient shall not cease to be so liable or so
subject until the end of that day; and
(b) in
any case, Articles 25 and 28 shall apply to the patient upon his or her
discharge from custody as if the patient were absent without leave on the day
of the discharge.
71 Committal
to Royal Court for making of orders
(1) This Article applies in
respect of a defendant who is convicted by a court other than the Royal Court
of an offence punishable with imprisonment.
(2) Where this Article
applies, if –
(a) a
court, other than the Royal Court, is satisfied as to the matters in Article 65(1)(a)
and (c), as it would be required to be satisfied were the court to consider
making a treatment order under that Article; and
(b) it
appears to the court, having regard to the matters in Article 68(2), that
if a treatment order were made in the case it should take effect with special
restrictions,
the court shall commit the defendant, in custody or as described in
paragraph (3), to be dealt with by the Royal Court.
(3) The court may by order
direct the defendant to be admitted to an approved establishment and to be
detained there until the case can be dealt with by the Royal Court, and may
further give directions for the conveyance of the defendant from that
establishment to attend the Royal Court.
(4) Where a defendant is
committed to the Royal Court under this Article, the Royal Court shall have all
such powers to deal with the defendant under this Part as it would have if the
defendant had been convicted before it, and –
(a) in
particular the Royal Court may, if it would have had power to do so upon
conviction of the defendant before it under Article 65 –
(i) make a treatment
order in respect of the defendant, and
(ii) if
it thinks fit and having regard to the matters in Article 68(2), make a
further order that the treatment order shall take effect with special
restrictions; and
(b) further,
the Royal Court may deal with the defendant in any other manner in which the court
committing the defendant could have dealt with him or her.
72 Special
verdicts
(1) Paragraph (2)
applies in any proceedings, whether or not a determination of incapacity has
been made under Part 8 in respect of the defendant.
(2) Where the court finds
that –
(a) the
defendant carried out the act alleged; but
(b) at
the time of carrying out the act, the defendant was suffering from mental
disorder to such a substantial degree that he or she ought not to be held
criminally responsible for doing so,
the court shall record a special verdict to that effect and may
either acquit the defendant or make such an order as it has power to make under
Article 59.
Part 10
Safeguarding: offences against those in receipt
of care etc.
73 Offence
of wilful neglect
(1) It is an offence for
the managers or any member of staff of an approved establishment to ill-treat
or wilfully neglect –
(a) a
patient for the time being detained or receiving treatment for mental disorder
in the approved establishment;
(b) on
the premises of which the establishment forms part, a patient receiving
treatment for mental disorder as an out-patient; and
(c) any
other person for the time being under this Law in the care or custody of the
establishment or of the mental health professional.
(2) It is an offence for
any individual to ill-treat or wilfully neglect –
(a) a
patient who is suffering from mental disorder and is for the time being subject
to the individual’s guardianship; and
(b) any
person who is otherwise in the individual’s care or custody whether by
virtue of any legal or moral obligation or otherwise.
(3) A person guilty of an
offence under this Article shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of
5 years and a fine.
74 Sexual
offences: prohibited acts
(1) It is an offence for
any person (“A”) to commit an act described in paragraph (2)
(in this Article and in Articles 75 and 76, a “prohibited
act”) with, towards, or in relation to, any other person
(“B”) where A knows, or could reasonably be expected to know,
that –
(a) B is
suffering from any mental disorder (including any learning disability); and
(b) because
of that disorder or for reasons related to it, B is unable to refuse
involvement in the act.
(2) For the purposes of paragraph (1),
A commits a prohibited act if –
(a) A intentionally
touches B, where the touching is sexual;
(b) A
intentionally causes or incites B to engage in an act which is sexual;
(c) A
intentionally engages in an act which is sexual, for the purpose of obtaining
sexual gratification, and does so –
(i) when B is either
present or in a place from which A can be observed by B,
(ii) knowing
or believing that B is aware, or intending that B should be aware, that A is
engaging in the act; or
(d) for
the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification, A intentionally causes B to
watch a third person engaging in an act which is sexual, or to look at an image
of any person engaging in such an act.
(3) For the purposes of
paragraph (2) –
(a) touching
includes touching –
(i) with any part of
the body,
(ii) with
anything else, and
(iii) through
anything; and
(b) touching
or any other act is sexual if a reasonable person would consider
that –
(i) whatever the
circumstances or any person’s purpose in relation to the act, it is
because of its nature sexual, or
(ii) because
of the nature of the act it may be sexual and because of its circumstances or
the purpose of any person in relation to it (or both), it is sexual.
(4) For the purposes of
paragraph (1)(b), B shall be deemed to be unable to refuse involvement in
an act if –
(a) B
lacks the capacity to choose whether or not to agree to such involvement
(whether because B does not understand the nature of the act, or for any other
reason); or
(b) for
any reason, B is unable freely to communicate such a choice to A.
75 Sexual
offences: relationship of care
(1) It is an offence for
any person (“A”) –
(a) to
commit a prohibited act with, towards or in relation to any other person
suffering from a mental disorder (“B”); or
(b) to
procure by inducement, threat, or deception, B’s participation in a
prohibited act,
where A is involved in B’s care in any way described in paragraphs (3)
or (4).
(2) Where A is involved in
B’s care for the purposes of paragraph (1), in determining whether
an offence has been committed under that paragraph it is to be presumed that,
unless the contrary is shown, A knows, or could reasonably be expected to know,
that B has a mental disorder.
(3) A is involved in
B’s care for the purposes of paragraph (1) if –
(a) B is
accommodated and cared for in an approved establishment or any other
residential or nursing home; or
(b) B is
a patient for whom care services are provided by any public or private health
care provider, whether in B’s home or elsewhere,
and A performs functions, in the course of A’s employment or
of services provided by A, which bring or are likely to bring A into regular
face-to-face contact with B.
(4) A is involved in
B’s care for the purposes of paragraph (1) if –
(a) A is,
whether or not in the course of employment, a provider of care, assistance or
services to B in connection with B’s mental disorder; and
(b) A is
likely to have regular face-to-face contact with B.
(5) It is a defence for A,
being charged with an offence under paragraph (1), to prove that, at the
time of the prohibited act –
(a) B was
aged 16 years or over; and
(b) A was
lawfully married to, or in a civil partnership with, B.
76 Sexual
offences: coercion
It is an offence for any person (“A”) to procure by
inducement, threat, or deception the participation of any other person
(“B”) in a prohibited act where A knows, or could reasonably be
expected to know, that B is a person suffering from a mental disorder.
77 Sexual
offences: penalties
(1) A person guilty of an
offence under Article 74(1) or Article 76 is liable –
(a) in
the case of a prohibited act described in Article 74(2(a) or (b) –
(i) where the act
involved penetration, to imprisonment for life, or
(ii) where
the act did not involve penetration, to imprisonment for a term of 14 years;
(b) in
the case of a prohibited act described in Article 74(2)(c) or (d), to
imprisonment for 10 years.
(2) A person guilty of an
offence under Article 75(1) is liable –
(a) in
the case of a prohibited act described in Article 74(2)(a) or (b) –
(i) where the act
involved penetration, to imprisonment for a term of 14 years, or
(ii) where
the act did not involve penetration, to imprisonment for a term of 10 years;
(b) in the
case of a prohibited act described in Article 74(2)(c) or (d), to
imprisonment for a term of 7 years.
(3) For the purposes of
this Article, “penetration” means penetration –
(a) of
the anus, mouth or vagina of one of the participants in the prohibited act;
(b) by a
part of the body of the other participant, or by anything else.
Part 11
Safeguarding: patients’ rights
78 Information
to be given to patients
(1) Where a patient is
detained or taken into guardianship under this Law, the managers of the approved
establishment in which the patient is detained or, as the case may be, the
Minister must, as soon as practicable after the detention or guardianship
commences, take all such steps as are reasonable to ensure that the patient
understands –
(a) under
which of the provisions of the Law the patient is detained or taken into
guardianship, and the effect of those provisions;
(b) what
rights of access to independent advocacy, representation and review are
available to the patient under this Law;
(c) the
effect, so far as relevant in that patient’s case, of Articles 7,
13, 27, Part 6, Articles 79, 81 to 84, 85 and 91; and
(d) such
other matters as may be required by Regulations, or a code of practice, under
this Law.
(2) The managers or, as the
case may be, the Minister must further (unless the patient requests otherwise)
take such steps as are practicable to provide the patient’s nearest
person, at the same time as or within a reasonable time of giving information
to the patient under paragraph (1), with the same information or, if in
writing, with a copy of that information.
(3) The steps to be taken
under paragraph (1) may include giving the information required either in
writing or orally, or by both means, having regard in particular to the
patient’s ability to understand the information, however given.
79 Independent
mental health advocates: regulations
(1) This Article applies to
make provision for the appointment of independent mental health advocates
(“MHAs”) to act in relation to and on behalf of qualifying
patients.
(2) The States may by
Regulations require the Minister to make reasonable arrangements –
(a) for
the appointment of independent mental health advocates (“MHAs”) in
accordance with further provision to be made by the Regulations of the kind
described in paragraph (3)(a) to (e); and
(b) as to
the role and conduct of MHAs, in accordance with provision to be made by the
Regulations of the kind described in paragraphs (3)(f) and (g), (4) and
(5).
(3) Regulations under this
Article may in particular make provision including (but not limited to)
provision as to –
(a) the
qualifications required of a person to be appointed;
(b) the
circumstances in which a person may so act;
(c) the
procedure for appointment and terms and conditions of appointment;
(d) the
circumstances in which the appointment may end or be terminated and the
formalities for doing so;
(e) as to
the nature and level of payment (whether by way of fees, or reimbursement of
expenses) which may be made to MHAs;
(f) steps
to be taken to ensure that qualifying patients and their nearest persons are
aware of the availability of the services of MHAs; and
(g) matters
in which MHAs may help qualifying patients, and the powers which MHAs may
exercise for the purpose of giving such help.
(4) Matters for the purpose
of paragraph (3)(g) include in particular –
(a) help
to be given to qualifying patients in obtaining information about, and
understanding –
(i) applicable and
relevant provisions of this Law, with particular regard to the rights of a
patient under it, and
(ii) the
nature, effects of, and basis (both legal and medical) for any treatment or
proposed treatment; and
(b) help
to be given to qualifying patients as to the proper exercise of those rights.
(5) Powers for the purpose
of paragraph (3)(g) include in particular –
(a) the
power to visit and interview patients in private;
(b) the
power to visit and interview any person professionally concerned with the
treatment of any patient, and the manner of its exercise;
(c) the
power to require disclosure and inspection of records relating to patients
(whether held by approved establishments, by the Minister or authorized
officers), and the circumstances and manner of the exercise of such power
(including, for the avoidance of doubt, provision as to circumstances in which
a patient may object to disclosure).
(6) In this
Article –
“qualifying patient” means –
(a) a
patient liable to be detained in an approved establishment under Part 3;
and
(b) a
patient subject to guardianship under Part 4; and
“independent” means independent of any other persons
professionally concerned with the care or treatment of a qualifying patient.
80 Forgery
and false statements
(1) A person who, with
intent to deceive –
(a) forges
any document required or authorized to be made under or for the purposes of
this Law; or
(b) uses,
allows any other person to use, or makes or has in his or her possession any
document which the person knows to be forged or to so closely resemble any
document listed in paragraph (2) as to be calculated to deceive,
is guilty of an offence.
(2) The documents mentioned
in paragraph (1)(b) include, in particular and without limitation –
(a) an
application under Part 3;
(b) any
medical recommendation, report or information required to be made, given or
provided under this Law; or
(c) any
other document required or authorized to be made under or for any of the
purposes of this Law.
(3) A person
who –
(a) knowingly
makes a false entry or statement in any document listed in paragraph (2);
or
(b) with intent
to deceive, makes use of such an entry or statement which the person knows to
be false,
is guilty of an offence.
(4) A person guilty of an
offence under this Article shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of
2 years and to a fine.
81 Provision
of patients’ allowances
Where it appears to the Minister that a patient in an approved
establishment (whether liable to be detained under Part 3 or not) would
otherwise be without resources to meet occasional personal expenses, the
Minister may pay to or on behalf of the patient such amount in respect of those
expenses as the Minister may think fit.
82 Restrictions
on access to electronic media and communications etc.
(1) Access by a patient
detained in an approved establishment to electronic media or communications, or
to a telephone (including any form of personal mobile device) may be restricted
if, in the opinion of the managers of the establishment, it is necessary to do
so –
(a) in
the interests of the health or safety of the patient; or
(b) for the
protection of other persons.
(2) Restrictions imposed
under paragraph (1) may include –
(a) restriction
of the ability of a patient to contact a specified person by any means
mentioned in that paragraph, where the person has requested such a restriction
by notice given in writing to the managers; and
(b) confiscation
of any article or device which may be used for the purposes of electronic media
or communications.
(3) Where any restriction
is imposed under paragraph (1) in respect of a patient’s access –
(a) the
managers shall, no later than 7 days after it is imposed, give notice in
writing of the restriction and of the right to review under Article 84 –
(i) to the patient,
and
(ii) where
the restriction relates to contact with a specified person as provided by paragraph (2),
to that person;
and
(b) the
managers shall record in writing the fact and nature of the restriction.
(4) Paragraph (1)
shall not apply so as to restrict communications by any means mentioned in that
paragraph between a patient and –
(a) the
Attorney General;
(b) a
member of the States;
(c) a
judicial officer of a court, including for this purpose the European Court of
Human Rights;
(d) the
patient’s legal representative;
(e) the
patient’s guardian;
(f) the
patient’s nearest person;
(g) an
independent mental health advocate;
(h) a
police officer;
(i) the
Mental Health Review Tribunal; or
(j) any
other person such as may be prescribed by Regulations made by the States for
this purpose.
83 Restrictions
on postal correspondence
(1) A postal packet
addressed to a patient detained in an approved establishment may be withheld
from the patient if, in the opinion of the managers of the establishment it is
necessary to do so –
(a) in
the interests of the health or safety of the patient; or
(b) for
the protection of other persons.
(2) A postal packet
addressed by a patient detained in an approved establishment may be withheld
from dispatch by the manager if –
(a) the
addressee has given notice in writing to the managers or the responsible
medical officer that any communications addressed to the addressee by the
patient should be withheld; or
(b) if it
appears to the managers that the communication –
(i) would be likely
to cause distress to the addressee, or
(ii) might
cause danger to any person.
(3) Paragraphs (1) and
(2) shall not apply so as to permit restriction of communications by post
between a patient and –
(a) the
Attorney General;
(b) a
member of the States;
(c) a
judicial officer of a court, including for this purpose the European Court of Human
Rights;
(d) the
patient’s legal representative;
(e) the
patient’s guardian;
(f) the
patient’s nearest person;
(g) an
independent mental health advocate;
(h) a
police officer;
(i) the
Mental Health Review Tribunal; or
(j) any
other person such as may be prescribed by Regulations made by the States for
this purpose.
(4) The managers of an
approved establishment may inspect and open a postal packet addressed to or by
a patient for the purpose of determining whether or not paragraphs (1) or
(2)(b) may apply, and for no other purpose.
(5) Where a postal packet
is withheld under this Article –
(a) the
managers shall, no later than 7 days after the postal packet is withheld,
give notice in writing of the fact and of the right to review under Article 84 –
(i) to the patient,
and
(ii) where
paragraph (2) applies, to the addressee;
and
(b) the
managers shall record in writing the fact of, and reason for, the withholding.
(6) In this Article,
“postal packet” has the same meaning as in section 27 of the Postal
Services Act 2011 of the United Kingdom.
84 Review
of restrictions, and offence where restriction unlawful
(1) The patient or, where
notice has been given to him or her under Article 83(5)(a), the addressee,
may apply to the Mental Health Review Tribunal, in such form as may be
prescribed or in writing substantially to the same effect, for a review of any
decision –
(a) under
Article 82, to restrict access to communications; or
(b) under
Article 83, to withhold a postal packet.
(2) An application under
paragraph (1) must be made within the period of 6 months beginning
with the date of receipt of notice of the decision of which review is sought.
(3) Upon determining the
application the Tribunal may –
(a) uphold
the decision; or
(b) quash
the decision and give such directions as to the restriction of communication by
or with the patient, or as to the disposal of the postal packet (as the case
may be) as the Tribunal may think fit.
(4) Except as provided by Articles 82
or 83, it shall not be lawful to restrict –
(a) a
patient’s access to electronic communications; or
(b) receipt
or dispatch of a postal packet by a patient,
and a person who does so unlawfully shall be guilty of an offence
and liable upon conviction to a fine of level 3 on the standard scale.
Part 12
Transfer of patients between Jersey and other
jurisdictions
85 Removal
from Jersey: role of Tribunal
(1) A patient may not be
removed from Jersey pursuant to Articles 86 to 88 except as authorized –
(a) by
order of the Court, in which case the Court shall have all such powers as are
conferred on the Minister under Articles 86(2), 87(2), 88 and 89; or
(b) by
the Minister, with the approval of the Tribunal.
(2) Where the Minister
authorizes removal under Article 86 or 87, the Minister must immediately
notify the Tribunal and the Tribunal shall review the authorization within the
period of 7 days beginning with the date of such notification.
(3) In this Part, reference
to a patient is to a patient liable to be detained under Part 3 or
pursuant to an order under Part 9.
(4) For the avoidance of
doubt the Tribunal shall not have power under this Article or otherwise to
review an authorization given under this Part by order of the Court.
86 Removal
of patient to another place in the British Islands
(1) The Minister may
authorize the removal of a patient from Jersey to another place in the British
Islands where it appears to the Minister that –
(a) such
removal is in the best interests of the patient;
(b) there
is provision in that place for the reception of the patient from Jersey
corresponding to Article 89; and
(c) arrangements
have been made for the patient’s admission in that place.
(2) When authorizing
removal under paragraph (1) the Minister may give any directions necessary
for the conveyance of the patient to the intended destination in the place
mentioned in that paragraph.
(3) Following removal of a
patient from Jersey under this Article, the assessment or treatment
authorization by virtue of which that patient is liable to be detained shall
cease to have effect upon admission of the patient pursuant to the arrangements
mentioned in paragraph (1)(c).
87 Removal
of patient to another place where no reciprocal arrangements
(1) The Minister may
authorize the removal of a patient from Jersey to another place in the British
Islands where it appears to the Minister that –
(a) such
removal is in the interests of the patient;
(b) there
is no provision in that place for the reception of the patient from Jersey
corresponding to Article 89 but the patient is ordinarily resident in that
place; and
(c) proper
arrangements have been made for the removal of the patient to that place, and
for the patient’s care and treatment there.
(2) When authorizing
removal under paragraph (1) the Minister may give such directions as the
Minister thinks fit for –
(a) the
conveyance of the patient to the intended destination in the place mentioned in
that paragraph; and
(b) the
detention of the patient in any other place or on board any ship or aircraft
until arrival at any specified port or other place in the British Islands.
88 Removal
of alien patient
(1) The Minister may
authorize the removal of a patient who is an alien where it appears to the
Minister that –
(a) such
removal is in the interests of the patient; and
(b) that
proper arrangements have been made for the removal of the patient to a country
or territory outside the British Islands and for the patient’s care and
treatment there.
(2) When authorizing
removal under paragraph (1) the Minister may give such directions as the
Minister thinks fit for –
(a) the
conveyance of the patient to the intended destination in the place mentioned in
that paragraph; and
(b) the
detention of the patient in any other place or on board any ship or aircraft
until arrival at any specified port or other place in the country or territory
concerned.
89 Reception
of patient into Jersey
(1) This Article applies
where a patient is removed to Jersey from another place in the British Islands
under an enactment corresponding to Article 86.
(2) Where this Article
applies and the patient is admitted to an approved establishment, this Law
shall apply to the patient as if, on the date of admission, the patient had
been so admitted pursuant to an application order or direction given under the
provision of this Law corresponding to the enactment of the place from which
the patient was removed and by virtue of which the patient was liable to be
detained in that place.
(3) While being conveyed in
Jersey to the approved establishment mentioned in paragraph (1), the
patient shall be deemed to be in legal custody.
Part 12A[4]
Part 13
Miscellaneous and general provisions
90 Codes
of practice
(1) The Minister must issue
a code of practice for the purposes of this Law and in particular (but without
limitation) for the guidance of persons, on whom functions are conferred by or
under this Law, in carrying out such functions.
(2) A code must include a
statement of such principles as the Minister may consider should inform
decisions (whether generally or in particular) under this Law, and the
statement must address each of the following matters and the weight to be
accorded to them –
(a) respect
for the wishes and feelings of patients so far as these can reasonably be
ascertained;
(b) involvement
of patients so far as reasonably possible in determining their own care and
treatment;
(c) respect
for diversity, including (but without limitation) issues of religion and sexual
orientation;
(d) minimal
restriction on liberty of patients;
(e) effectiveness
of treatment;
(f) respect
for the views of patients’ carers;
(g) the
wellbeing and safety of patients; and
(h) public
safety.
(3) In issuing a code the
Minister must also have regard to the need to ensure –
(a) the
efficient use of resources; and
(b) the
equitable distribution of services.
(4) Paragraph (5)
applies where it appears to the court or to the Tribunal, when conducting any
civil or criminal proceedings, that –
(a) a
provision of a code issued under this Article; or
(b) a
failure to comply with a requirement of any such code,
is relevant to a question arising in those proceedings.
(5) Where this paragraph
applies, the relevant provision or failure must be taken into account in
determining the question, but a failure to comply with a code shall not of
itself make a person liable to any civil or criminal proceedings.
(6) The Minister may amend
a code from time to time as the Minister may see fit, and a code may make, as
respects any matter in relation to which it makes provision –
(a) the
same provision for all cases, or different provision for different cases or
classes of case, or different provision for the same case or class of case for
different purposes; and
(b) any
such provision either unconditionally or subject to any specified conditions.
(7) Before issuing or
amending a code, the Minister must consult such bodies as appear to the
Minister to be concerned.
(8) The Minister must
publish any code of practice which is for the time being in force in such
manner as may appear to the Minister to be appropriate for bringing it to the
attention of persons likely to be concerned with or affected by its provisions.
91 Offence
of assisting patient to abscond
(1) A person who induces or
knowingly assists a patient liable to be detained, or subject to guardianship,
under this Law to absent himself or herself without leave from an approved
establishment or the custody of his or her guardian (as the case may be) is
guilty of an offence.
(2) A person
who –
(a) knowingly
harbours a patient who is absent without leave or is otherwise at large and
liable to be retaken under the provisions of Part 5 or Part 9; or
(b) gives,
with intent to prevent, hinder or interfere with the patient being retaken into
custody or returned to an approved establishment, any assistance to such a
patient,
is guilty of an offence.
(3) A person guilty of an
offence under this Article is liable to imprisonment for a term of 2 years
and a fine.
92 Offence
of obstruction
A person who –
(a) refuses to allow the
inspection of any premises;
(b) without reasonable
cause, refuses to allow the visiting, interviewing or examination of a patient
by a person authorized in that behalf by or under this Law;
(c) refuses to produce for
the inspection of any such authorized person any document or record duly
required by that person; or
(d) otherwise obstructs any
such authorized person in the exercise of his or her functions under this Law,
is guilty of an offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of
3 months and a fine of level 3 on the standard scale.
93 Protection
for acts done in pursuance of this Law
(1) No liability is
incurred by any person in respect of any act done in the discharge or purported
discharge of a function conferred on the person by or under this Law.
(2) Paragraph (1) does
not apply –
(a) if it
is shown that the act in question was done in bad faith, or without due and
reasonable care; or
(b) so as
to prevent an award of damages made in respect of the act on the ground that
the act was unlawful under Article 7(1) of the Human Rights (Jersey)
Law 2000.
94 Regulations
(1) The States may by
Regulations make provision for the purpose of giving full effect to this Law
and, in particular but without derogation from the generality of this power, such
Regulations –
(a) may
make provision for or in respect of any matter that by this Law is required or
permitted to be done by Regulations; and
(b) may
amend any enactment.
(2) Regulations under this
Law may make such transitional, saving, incidental, consequential or
supplementary provision as may appear to the States to be necessary or
expedient for the purposes of the Regulations.
95 Orders
(1) The Minister may make
Orders for prescribing anything which is required or authorized to be
prescribed under this Law.
(2) For the purpose of
giving full effect to this Law, the Minister may by Order –
(a) prescribe
the form of any application, recommendation, report, direction, notice or other
document to be made, given or provided under this Law;
(b) prescribe
the manner in which any such document as is mentioned in sub-paragraph (a)
may be served, and proved in evidence;
(c) prescribe
for a register or other records to be kept in respect of patients liable to be
detained or subject to guardianship under this Law;
(d) make
provision for providing or making available to such patients and their
relatives and nearest persons written statements of patients’ rights
under this Law;
(e) make
provision for the determination of the age of any person whose exact age cannot
be ascertained by reference to registers kept under the Marriage and Civil Status
(Jersey) Law 2001;
(f) make
provision for enabling functions of a patient’s nearest person or guardian
to be performed, in such circumstances and subject to such conditions as may be
prescribed, by any person authorized to do so by the relative or guardian; and
(g) make
provision as to the conditions under which patients may be transferred under Part 12.
(3) Orders under this Law
may make such transitional, saving, supplementary and consequential provision
as may appear to the Minister to be necessary or appropriate.
(4) [5]
96 Rules
of Court
The power to make rules of court under the Royal Court (Jersey)
Law 1948 includes power to make rules regulating practice and procedure in
or in connection with proceedings before the court under this Law and in
particular (but without derogation from the generality of this power) to make
rules as to –
(a) applications under
Articles 11, 12, 67 and 69 (including the hearing and determination of
applications otherwise than in open court); and
(b) the visiting and
interviewing of patients in private, by or under the direction of the Court.
97 Saving
Article 43 of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 1969 (and, so
far as necessary for the purposes of that Article, Articles 1, 3, 4 and
Part 2 of, and Schedule 2 to that Law) shall continue to have effect
until the commencement, if occurring after the commencement of this Law, of Part 4
of the Capacity Law.
98 Citation
This Law may be cited as the Mental
Health (Jersey) Law 2016.