Money Laundering
(Jersey) Order 2008
Part 1
Introductory provisions
1 Interpretation
(1) In
this Order, unless the context otherwise requires –
“branch” in respect of a relevant person, means a branch
that is under the control of that relevant person;
“business relationship” means a business, professional
or commercial relationship between a relevant person and a customer, which is
expected by the relevant person, at the time when contact is established, to
have an element of duration;
“compliance officer” means –
(a) an
individual appointed under paragraph (1) or (4) of Article 7; or
(b) an
individual described in Article 7(2);
“customer” means a person;
“customer due diligence measures” means the measures
described in Article 3(1);
“designated person” means an individual who is
designated under Article 9;
“designated supervisory body” means a supervisory body
designated under Article 6 of the Proceeds of Crime (Supervisory Bodies)
Law;
“enhanced customer due diligence measures” means
customer due diligence measures that involve specific and adequate measures to
compensate for the higher risk of money laundering;
“equivalent business” has the meaning in Article 5;
“FATF” means the international body known as the Financial
Action Task Force;
“FATF recommendations” means the FATF Recommendations
adopted on 16th February 2012 and as amended or replaced from time to time;
“Financial Intelligence Unit” has the meaning given to
FIU by the Proceeds of Crime (Financial
Intelligence) (Jersey) Regulations 2015;
“identification measures” means those measures described
in Article 3(2);
“insurance business” means any long term-business,
within the meaning given to that term in Article 1(1) of the Insurance Business (Jersey)
Law 1996 but does not include –
(a) any
insurance business described in
Article 5(5)(a) of that Law; or
(b) any insurance business
described in Article 1 of the Insurance Business (General Provisions) (Jersey) Order 1996;
“IOSCO-compliant market” means a market which, in line
with standards set by the international body known as the International
Organisation of Securities Commissions, requires that –
(a) for
traded securities there must be full, accurate and timely disclosure of
financial results, risk and other information which is material to
investors’ decisions; and
(b) holders
of traded securities should be treated in a fair and equitable manner;
“Jersey body corporate” means a body that is
incorporated in Jersey (other than a limited liability company registered as a
body corporate under the Limited Liability Companies
(Jersey) Law 2018);
“Jersey limited liability partnership” means a limited
liability partnership that is registered under the Limited Liability
Partnerships (Jersey) Law 2017;
“Law” means the Proceeds of Crime (Jersey)
Law 1999;
“limited liability company” means a limited liability
company registered under the Limited Liability Companies
(Jersey) Law 2018 or an equivalent law of a jurisdiction outside Jersey;
“obliged person” means a person who the relevant person
knows or has reasonable grounds for believing is –
(a) a
relevant person in respect of whose financial services business the Commission
discharges supervisory functions; or
(b) a
person carrying on equivalent business;
“one-off transaction” has the meaning in Article 4;
“on-going monitoring” has the meaning in Article 3(3);
“overseas regulatory authority”, in respect of a country
or territory outside Jersey, means an authority discharging in that country or
territory a function that is the same or similar to a function of the
Commission in respect of the prevention and detection of money laundering;
“politically exposed person” means any of the following
as defined in Article 15A –
(a) a
domestic politically exposed person;
(b) a
foreign politically exposed person;
(c) a
prominent person;
“Proceeds of Crime (Supervisory Bodies) Law” means the Proceeds of Crime
(Supervisory Bodies) (Jersey) Law 2008;
“public authority” means a person holding a public
office in Jersey;
“public notice” means a notice published in the Jersey
Gazette, or a notice whose contents are brought to the attention of the public
by the taking of other reasonable steps for that purpose;
“regulated business” means a financial services business
in respect of which a person –
(a) is
registered under the Banking Business (Jersey)
Law 1991;
(b) holds
a permit or is a certificate holder under the Collective Investment Funds
(Jersey) Law 1988;
(c) is
registered under the Financial Services (Jersey)
Law 1998; or
(d) is
authorized by a permit under the Insurance Business (Jersey)
Law 1996;
“regulated person” means a person carrying on a
regulated business;
“relevant person” means –
(a) a
person carrying on a financial services business in or from within Jersey; or
(b) either –
(i) a
Jersey body corporate, or
(ii) other
legal person registered in Jersey,
carrying on a financial services business in any part of the world
but for the purposes of this definition “financial services
business” does not include the business of acting, otherwise than as a business,
as trustee of an express trust;
“reporting officer” means an individual who is appointed
under Article 8(1) or (3);
“secondary recipient” means any person to whom
information has been passed by the Commission or a designated supervisory body;
“sole trader” means an individual carrying on a
financial services business, who does not in the course of doing
so –
(a) employ
any other person; or
(b) act
in association with any other person;
“source of the funds” means the source of the funds that
are used or to be used in a business relationship or a one-off transaction;
“subsidiary” means, in relation to a relevant person, a
legal person that is majority owned or controlled by the relevant person;
“Terrorism Law” means the Terrorism (Jersey) Law 2002;
“third party” includes a person, trust or any other
legal arrangement.[1]
(2) In
this Order –
(a) a
reference to a document, information or record, or to anything else in writing,
includes a reference to a document, information, record or writing in
electronic form; and
(b) a
reference to any amount that is expressed in sterling or euros includes a
reference to an equivalent amount in any other currency.
(3) In
this Order a person is regarded as being resident in a country if –
(a) in
the case of an individual, he or she has provided an address in that country;
or
(b) in
the case of a legal person, the person is registered, incorporated or otherwise
established under the law of that country.[2]
(4) In
this Order a reference to a country not being compliant with FATF
recommendations is a reference to a country in respect of which FATF has made a
public statement identifying the country as one with deficiencies in its
anti-money laundering strategy or its strategy for countering the financing of
terrorism.[3]
(5) In
this Order, a person is a member of the same financial group as another person
if there is, in relation to the group, a parent company or other legal person
that exercises control over every member of that group for the purposes of
applying group supervision under –
(a) the
core principles for effective banking supervision published by the Basel
Committee on Banking Supervision (ISBN 92-9131-164-4);
(b) the
Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation issued by the International
Organisation of Securities Commissions; or
(c) the
Insurance Supervisory Principles issued by the International Association of
Insurance Supervisors.[4]
2 Beneficial
ownership and control
(1) For
the purposes of this Order, each of the following individuals is a beneficial
owner or controller of a person (“other person”) where that other
person is not an individual –
(a) an
individual who is an ultimate beneficial owner of that other person (whether or
not the individual is its only ultimate beneficial owner); and
(b) an
individual who ultimately controls or otherwise exercises control over the
management of that other person (whether the individual does so alone or with
any other person or persons).
(2) For
the purposes of paragraph (1) it is immaterial whether an
individual’s ultimate ownership or control is direct or indirect.
(3) No
individual is to be treated by reason of this Article as a beneficial owner of
a person that is a body corporate or a limited liability company the securities
of which are listed on a regulated market.[5]
(4) In
determining whether an individual is a beneficial owner or controller of
another person, regard must be had to all the circumstances of the case, in particular
the size of an individual’s beneficial ownership or degree of control
having regard to the risk of that individual or that other person being
involved in money laundering.
(5) For
the purposes of this Article, “regulated market” has the same meaning
as in the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 S.I. 2007/2157 of the
United Kingdom.
3 Meaning
of “customer due diligence measures”[6]
(1) “Customer
due diligence measures” means, in respect of the customers of a relevant
person’s financial services business, identification measures and
on-going monitoring.[7]
(2) Identification
measures are measures for –
(a) identifying
the customer;
(aa) identifying
any person purporting to act on behalf of the customer and verifying the
authority of any person purporting so to act;
(b) determining
whether the customer is acting for a third party, whether directly or
indirectly, and, if so –
(i) identifying
that third party,
(ii) where
the third party is a person other than an individual, understanding the
ownership and control of that third party and identifying each individual who
is that third party’s beneficial owner or controller,
(iii) where
the third party is not a person –
(A) understanding
the nature of the legal arrangement under which the third party is constituted
(for example, in the case of a trust, the type of trust),
(B) identifying
each person who falls within paragraph (7), and
(C) in
respect of each person falling within paragraph (7) who is not an
individual, understanding the ownership and control of that person and
identifying each individual who is that person’s beneficial owner or
controller;
(c) in
respect of a customer that is not an individual –
(i)
(ii) understanding
the ownership and control structure of that customer and the provisions under which
the customer can enter into contracts, or other similar legally binding
arrangements, with third parties, and
(iii) identifying
the individuals who are the customer’s beneficial owners or controllers;
(d) obtaining
information on the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship or
one-off transaction.[8]
(3) On-going
monitoring means –
(a) scrutinizing
transactions undertaken throughout the course of a business relationship to
ensure that the transactions being conducted are consistent with the relevant
person’s knowledge of the customer, including the customer’s
business and risk profile (such scrutiny to include, where necessary, the
source of the funds); and
(b) ensuring
that documents, data or information obtained under identification measures are
kept up to date and relevant by undertaking reviews of existing records, particularly
in relation to higher risk categories of customers, including but without
prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, reviews where any inconsistency
has been discovered as a result of the scrutiny described in sub-paragraph (a).[9]
(4) For
the purposes of paragraph (2), identification of a person
means –
(a) finding
out the identity of that person, including that person’s name and legal
status; and
(b) obtaining
evidence, on the basis of documents, data or information from a reliable and
independent source, that is reasonably capable of verifying that the person to
be identified is who the person is said to be and satisfies the person
responsible for the identification of a person that the evidence does establish
that fact.[10]
(4A) For the purposes of paragraph (4)(b),
a digital identification system that complies with the FATF Guidance on Digital
Identity published on 6th March 2020 as amended or replaced from time to time constitutes
a reliable and independent source.[11]
(5) For
the purposes of paragraph (2), the measures must include the assessment by
the relevant person of the risk that any business relationship or one-off
transaction will involve money laundering, including obtaining appropriate
information for assessing that risk.[12]
(6) For
the purposes of paragraph (2)(b) and (c), measures for obtaining evidence
must involve reasonable measures having regard to all the circumstances of the
case, including the degree of risk assessed.[13]
(7) For
the purposes of paragraph (2)(b)(iii), a person falls within this
paragraph if –
(a) that
person is, in relation to a trust that is the third party, a settlor or
protector;
(b) that
person, having regard to the risk of that person being involved in money
laundering –
(i) has
a beneficial interest in the third party,
(ii) is
the object of a trust power in relation to a trust that is the third party; or
(c) that
person is an individual who otherwise exercises ultimate effective control over
the third party.[14]
4 Meaning
of “one-off transaction”
(1) For
the purposes of this Order, a “one-off transaction”
means –
(a) a
transaction (other than in respect of money or value transfer services or a
virtual currency exchange business, or operating a casino) amounting to not
less than 15,000 euros;
(b) 2
or more transactions (other than in respect of money or value transfer services
or a virtual currency exchange business, or operating a casino) –
(i) where
it appears at the outset to any person handling any of the transactions that
the transactions are linked and that the total amount of those transactions is
not less than 15,000 euros, or
(ii) where
at any later stage it comes to the attention of any person handling any of
those transactions that clause (i) is satisfied;
(c) a
transaction amounting to not less than 1,000 euros and carried out in the
course of money or value transfer services or of a virtual currency exchange
business;
(d) 2
or more transactions carried out in the course of money or value transfer
services or of a virtual currency exchange business –
(i) where
it appears at the outset to any person handling any of the transactions that
those transactions are linked and that the total amount of those transactions
is not less than 1,000 euros, or
(ii) where
at any later stage it comes to the attention of any person handling any of
those transactions that clause (i) is satisfied;
(e) a
transaction amounting to not less than 3,000 euros carried out in the
course of operating a casino; or
(f) 2
or more transactions carried out in the course of operating a
casino –
(i) where
it appears at the outset to any person handling any of the transactions that
those transactions are linked and that the total amount of those transactions
is not less than 3,000 euros, or
(ii) where
at any later stage it comes to the attention of any person handling any of
those transactions that clause (i) is satisfied.[15]
(2) In this Article –
(a) “transaction”
means a transaction other than one carried out during a business relationship;
and
(b) “money
or value transfer services” has the same meaning as in paragraph 5
of Schedule 2 to the Law;
(c) “virtual
currency exchange business” means the business of conducting one or more
of the activities or operations to, for or on behalf of another natural or
legal person or arrangement set out in paragraph 24(2)(a), (b) and (c) of
Schedule 2 to the Proceeds of Crime (Jersey)
Law 1999.[16]
5 Equivalent
business
For the purposes of this Order, business (“other
business”) is equivalent business in relation to any category of
financial services business carried on in Jersey if –
(a) the
other business is carried on in a country or territory other than Jersey;
(b) if
carried on in Jersey, it would be financial services business of that category
(whether or not it is called by the same name in Jersey);
(c) in
that other country or territory, the business may only be carried on by a
person registered or otherwise authorized for that purpose under the law of
that country or territory;
(d) the
conduct of the business is subject to requirements to forestall and prevent
money laundering that are consistent with those in the FATF recommendations in
respect of that business; and
(e) the
conduct of the business is supervised, for compliance with the requirements to
which paragraph (d) refers, by an overseas regulatory authority.
6 [17]
7 Compliance
officer
(1) Subject
to Article 9A, a relevant person (other than a sole trader) must appoint
an individual as the compliance officer in respect of the financial services
business being carried on by the relevant person.[18]
(2) A
sole trader is the compliance officer in respect of his or her financial
services business.
(2A) A relevant
person must ensure that –
(a) the
individual appointed as compliance officer under this Article is of an
appropriate level of seniority; and
(b) such
compliance officer has timely access to all records that are necessary or
expedient for the purpose of performing his or her functions as a compliance
officer, including, in particular, the records that a relevant person must keep
under Article 19.[19]
(3) The
compliance officer’s function is to monitor whether the enactments in
Jersey relating to money laundering and any relevant Code of Practice issued
under Article 22 of the Proceeds of Crime (Supervisory Bodies) Law are
being complied with in the conduct of the relevant person’s financial
services business.[20]
(4) When
a named individual has ceased to be the compliance officer, the relevant person
must appoint another individual forthwith as compliance officer in respect of
the financial services business being carried on by the relevant person.
(5) In
the case of an individual appointed under paragraph (1) or (4), the
compliance officer is responsible to the relevant person.
(6) Subject
to paragraph (9), a relevant person must give the Commission written
notice within one month after the date –
(a) an
appointment under paragraph (1) or (4) takes effect; or
(b) an
individual ceases to be the compliance officer.
(7) The
notice is to specify the name of that compliance officer and the date on which his
or her appointment takes effect or he or she ceases to be the compliance
officer.
(8) A
compliance officer may also be appointed as a reporting officer.
(9) Paragraphs (10)
and (11) apply where a relevant person is a regulated person and the Commission
has been notified in respect of that relevant person’s regulated business
pursuant to another enactment of the name of a person who has acquired, is to
acquire, or ceased to have, the function described in paragraph (3)
(“notified person”).
(10) The
notified person shall be deemed to have been appointed under this Article and
the relevant person will be deemed to have complied with paragraph (6).[21]
(11) Where
the Commission has objected to the notified person under that other enactment
mentioned in paragraph (9) –
(a) the
notified person shall be deemed to have ceased being the compliance officer
under this Article from the date that the objection took effect under that
other enactment (whether or not his or her appointment as compliance officer
took effect); and
(b) the
relevant person shall be deemed to have complied with paragraph (6) in the
case described in sub-paragraph (b).
(12) The
requirement in paragraph (1) applies in respect of any financial services
business carried on by the relevant person on or after 1st April 2008.
8 Reporting
officer
(1) Subject
to Article 9A, a relevant person (other than a sole trader) must appoint
an individual as the reporting officer in respect of the financial services
business being carried on by the relevant person.[22]
(2) The
reporting officer’s function is to receive and consider reports in
accordance with Article 21.
(2A) A relevant
person must ensure that –
(a) the
individual appointed as reporting officer under this Article is of an
appropriate level of seniority; and
(b) such
reporting officer has timely access to all records that are necessary or
expedient for the purpose of performing his or her functions as a reporting
officer, including, in particular, the records that a relevant person must keep
under Article 19.[23]
(3) When
a named individual has ceased to be the reporting officer, the relevant person
must appoint another individual forthwith as the reporting officer in respect
of the financial services business being carried on by the relevant person.
(4) Subject
to paragraph (7), a relevant person must give the Commission written
notice, within one month after the date –
(a) an
appointment under paragraph (1) or (3) takes effect; or
(b) a
person ceases to be the reporting officer.
(5) The
notice is to specify the name of that reporting officer and the date on which his
or her appointment takes effect or he or she ceases to be the reporting
officer.
(6) A
reporting officer may also be appointed as a compliance officer.
(7) Paragraphs (8)
and (9) apply where a relevant person is a regulated person and the Commission
has been notified in respect of that relevant person’s regulated business
pursuant to another enactment of the name of a person who has acquired, is to
acquire, or ceased to have, the function described in paragraph (2)
(“notified person”).
(8) The
notified person shall be deemed to have been appointed under this Article and
the relevant person will be deemed to have complied with paragraph (4).[24]
(9) Where
the Commission has objected to the notified person under that other
enactment –
(a) the
notified person shall be deemed to have ceased being the reporting officer
under this Article from the date that the objection took effect under that
other enactment (whether or not his or her appointment as reporting officer
took effect); and
(b) the
relevant person shall be deemed to have complied with paragraph (4) in the
case described in sub-paragraph (b).
9 Designated
persons
(1) A
relevant person may designate one or more individuals (other than the reporting
officer) to whom reports may be made in the first instance, for onward
transmission, where required under this Order, to the reporting officer.
(2) A relevant
person must ensure that –
(a) a
designated person is of an appropriate level of seniority; and
(b) a
designated person has timely access to all records that are necessary or
expedient for the purpose of performing his or her functions as a designated
person, including, in particular, the records that a relevant person must keep
under Article 19.[25]
9A Appointment
of anti-money laundering services provider to fulfil obligations of relevant
person[26]
(1) Despite
anything in this Order or the Proceeds of Crime (Jersey) Law 1999, a relevant person may, if it meets the criteria set out in the
public notice issued under paragraph (4)(a), appoint an anti-money
laundering services provider for the purpose of fulfilling the obligations of
the relevant person –
(a) to
appoint a compliance officer under Article 7 and a reporting officer under
Article 8; and
(b) to comply
with any other requirement of the relevant person under this Order.
(2) An
anti-money laundering services provider appointed under paragraph (1)
must –
(a) fulfil
the obligations of the relevant person to appoint a compliance officer under
Article 7 and a reporting officer under Article 8;
(b) subject
to paragraph (3), appoint an individual who is an employee of the anti-money
laundering services provider as the compliance officer or reporting officer
under sub-paragraph (a); and
(c) fulfil
the obligations of the relevant person to comply with the requirements of the
relevant person under this Order in respect of which the anti-money laundering
services provider is appointed under paragraph (1)(b).
(3) An
anti-money laundering services provider appointed under paragraph (1) must
not appoint an individual as a reporting officer or compliance officer under
this Article unless –
(a) the
Commission has, on the application of the anti-money laundering services
provider, issued a notice of no objection in respect of that individual; or
(b) the individual
falls within a category or description of individuals that are approved by the
Commission to be appointed as a reporting officer or compliance officer in
respect of the category or description of relevant person for which the
appointment is made.
(4) The
Commission must, by giving public notice, establish any of the following –
(a) the
criteria that must be met before a relevant person may appoint an anti-money
laundering services provider under paragraph (1);
(b) the
characteristics that a person must have in order to be eligible to be appointed
as an anti-money laundering services provider under paragraph (1);
(c) the
matters to be considered by the Commission prior to it issuing a notice of no
objection under paragraph (3)(a).
(5) The
Commission may issue guidance as to its procedure and approach for –
(a) issuing
a notice of no objection under paragraph (3)(a); or
(b) approving
a category or description of individuals under paragraph (3)(b).
(6) Where
an anti-money laundering services provider is appointed to fulfil the
obligations of a relevant person under this Article, both the relevant person
and the anti-money laundering services provider are responsible for fulfilling
the obligations.
(7) Paragraph (6)
does not limit any power of the Commission under Article 22 of the Proceeds of Crime (Supervisory Bodies) (Jersey) Law 2008 to issue a Code of Practice to set out –
(a) practical
steps required of the relevant person and the anti-money laundering services
provider appointed under paragraph (1); and
(b) the
degree of oversight and management to be expected of a relevant person in
respect of an anti-money laundering services provider.
(8) The
Commission may require an anti-money laundering services provider appointed
under paragraph (1) to revoke the appointment of a reporting officer or
compliance officer in respect of any or all the obligations of the relevant
person.
(9) The
anti-money laundering services provider must comply with the requirement under
paragraph (8).
10 Exemptions
from Articles 7 and 8
(1) The
Commission may by public notice exempt a relevant person or any class or
description of relevant person carrying on any class of financial services
business from the obligation in Article 7(6) or from the obligation in Article 8(4).
(2) The
Commission may by public notice revoke any such exemption from a date specified
in the notice.
(3) The
date to be specified must allow a reasonable period of time for compliance with
the obligation to which the exemption relates.
10A Financial services
business carried on outside Jersey[27]
(1) This
Article applies to financial services business carried on in a country or
territory outside Jersey.
(2) Subject
to the provisions of this Article, a relevant person who falls within paragraph (b)
of the definition “relevant person” must –
(a) comply
with the requirements of this Order in respect of any financial services
business to which this Article applies carried on by the relevant person;
(b) ensure
that any subsidiary of that relevant person applies measures that are at least
equivalent to the requirements of this Order in respect of any financial
services business to which this Article applies carried on by that subsidiary.
(3) Subject
to the provisions of this Article, a relevant person to whom paragraph (5)
applies must apply measures that are at least equivalent to the requirements of
this Order in respect of any financial services business to which this Article
applies carried on by any branch.
(4) Subject
to the provisions of this Article, a relevant person to whom paragraph (5)
applies must ensure that any subsidiary of that relevant person applies
measures that are at least equivalent to the requirements of this Order in
respect of any financial services business to which this Article applies
carried on by that subsidiary.
(5) This
paragraph applies to a relevant person who –
(a) falls
within paragraph (a) of the definition “relevant person”;
(b) does
not fall within paragraph (b) of that definition; and
(c) is
not registered, incorporated or otherwise established other than under Jersey
law.[28]
(6) Subject
to paragraph (9), a relevant person must –
(a) take
reasonable steps to comply with paragraphs (2), (3) and (4) to the
extent that the law of the country or territory in which that person carries on
a financial services business, or has a subsidiary carrying on such a business,
does not have the effect of prohibiting or preventing the relevant person from
taking such steps; and
(b) if
the relevant person does not comply with paragraphs (2), (3) and
(4) –
(i) inform
the supervisory body exercising supervisory functions in relation to that
relevant person under the Proceeds of Crime
(Supervisory Bodies) (Jersey) Law 2008, and
(ii) take
other reasonable steps to deal effectively with the risk of money laundering. [29]
(7) [30]
(8) [31]
(9) A
relevant person need not comply with paragraphs (2), (3) and (4) in a
country or territory outside Jersey in respect of any financial services
business that falls within paragraphs 18 to 22 of Schedule 2 to the
Law.[32]
(10) If, in a
country or territory outside Jersey –
(a) a
relevant person carries on a financial services business or has a subsidiary
carrying on such a business; and
(b) that
country or territory has more stringent requirements than those set out in this
Order,
the relevant person must ensure that those more stringent requirements
are complied with.
Part 2
Prevention and detection of money laundering[33]
11 Policies, procedures and
training to prevent and detect money laundering[34]
(1) A
relevant person must maintain appropriate and consistent policies and
procedures relating to –
(a) customer
due diligence measures;
(b) reporting
in accordance with the provisions in the Law and the Terrorism Law mentioned in
Article 21(6);
(c) record-keeping;
(d) screening
of employees;
(e) internal
control;
(f) risk
assessment and management; and
(g) the
monitoring and management of compliance with, and the internal communication
of, such policies and procedures,
in respect of that person’s financial services business
carried on in Jersey or elsewhere, or a financial services business carried on
in Jersey or elsewhere by a subsidiary of that person, in order to prevent and
detect money laundering.[35]
(2) In
paragraph (1), “appropriate and consistent policies and
procedures” means policies and procedures that are appropriate and
consistent having regard to the degree of risk of money laundering taking into
account –
(a) the
level of risk identified in a national or sector-specific risk assessment in
relation to money laundering carried out in respect of Jersey; and
(b) the
type of customers, business relationships, products and transactions with which
the relevant person’s business is concerned.[36]
(3) The
policies and procedures referred to in paragraph (2) must include policies
and procedures for –
(a) the
identification and scrutiny of –
(i) complex
or unusually large transactions,
(ii) unusual
patterns of transactions which have no apparent economic or visible lawful
purpose, and
(iii) any
other activity which the relevant person regards as particularly likely by its
nature to be related to the risk of money laundering;
(b) the
taking of additional measures, where appropriate, to prevent the use for money
laundering of products and transactions which are susceptible to anonymity;
(ba) in relation to
the development of new products, services or practices, including new delivery
mechanisms, the identification and assessment of associated risks before the
launch of such products, services or practices and the taking of appropriate
measures to manage and mitigate those risks;
(bb) in relation to
the use of new or developing technologies for new or existing products or
services, the identification and assessment of associated risks before the
launch of such technologies and the taking of appropriate measures to manage
and mitigate those risks;
(c) determining
whether –
(i) a
customer,
(ii) a
beneficial owner or controller of a customer,
(iii) a
third party for whom a customer is acting,
(iv) a
beneficial owner or controller of a third party described in clause (iii),
(v) a
person acting, or purporting to act, on behalf of a customer,
(vi) a
beneficiary under a life insurance policy,
(vii) a
beneficial owner or controller of a beneficiary under a life insurance policy,
is a politically exposed person;
(d) determining
whether a business relationship or transaction, or proposed business
relationship or transaction, is with a person connected with a country or
territory in relation to which the FATF has called for the application of
enhanced customer due diligence measures;
(e) determining
whether a business relationship or transaction or a proposed business
relationship or transaction is with a person that is –
(i) subject
to measures under law applicable in Jersey for the prevention and detection of
money laundering,
(ii) connected
with an organization that is subject to such measures, or
(iii) connected
with a country or territory that is subject to such measures;
(f) assessing
the risk referred to in Article 13(4)(b);
(fa) ensuring
the periodic reporting to the senior management of a relevant person cases
where, in reliance upon Article 13(4), identification measures have been
completed after the establishment of a business relationship so as to enable
the relevant person to –
(i) assess
that appropriate arrangements are in place for the relevant person to address
any risk of money laundering that arises in such cases, and
(ii) ensure
that identification measures are completed as soon as reasonably practicable,
as required by Article 13(4);
(fb) managing
the risks in relation to the conditions under which a customer may utilise a
business relationship with the relevant person before the identification of the
customer has been completed;
(g) having
particular regard to the requirements of Article 10A in respect of any
branch and subsidiary of the relevant person where such branch or subsidiary is
situated in a country or territory that does not apply, or insufficiently
applies, the FATF recommendations.[37]
(3A) For the
purposes of paragraph (3)(a) “scrutiny” includes scrutinising
the background and purpose of transactions and activities.[38]
(4) For
the purposes of this Article “transaction” means any of the
following –
(a) a
one-off transaction;
(b) transactions
within a one-off transaction; and
(c) transactions
within a business relationship.[39]
(5) [40]
(6) A
relevant person need not comply with paragraph (1) in a country or
territory outside Jersey in respect of any financial services business that
falls within paragraphs 18 to 22 of Schedule 2 to the Law.[41]
(6A) A relevant
person carrying on business described in paragraph 18 of Schedule 2 to
the Law must ensure that the customer due diligence information obtained in
relation to a customer can be linked to each one-off transaction made by the
customer in relation to that business.[42]
(7) [43]
(8) A
relevant person with any subsidiary or branch that carries on a financial
services business must communicate to that subsidiary or branch that
person’s policies and procedures for complying with paragraph (1).[44]
(9) A
relevant person must take appropriate measures from time to time for the
purposes of making employees whose duties relate to the provision of financial
services business aware of the following things –
(a) the
policies and procedures under paragraph (1) that are maintained by that
person and relate to the business; and
(b) the
enactments in Jersey relating to money laundering and any relevant Code of
Practice issued under Article 22 of the Proceeds of Crime (Supervisory
Bodies) Law.[45]
(10) A
relevant person must provide those employees from time to time with training in
the recognition and handling of –
(a) transactions
carried out by or on behalf of any person who is or appears to be engaged in
money laundering; and
(b) other
conduct that indicates that a person is or appears to be engaged in money
laundering.
(10A) For the purposes of paragraph (10),
such training shall include the provision of information on current money
laundering techniques, methods and trends.[46]
(11) A
relevant person must maintain adequate procedures for monitoring and testing
the effectiveness of the following actions –
(a) the
policies and procedures maintained under paragraph (1);
(b) the
measures taken under paragraph (9); and
(c) the
training provided under paragraph (10).[47]
(12) A
relevant person, when considering the type and extent of the testing to be
carried out under paragraph (11), shall have regard to the risk of money
laundering that exists in respect of the relevant person’s business, and
matters that may have an impact on that risk, such as the size
and nature and structure of the relevant person’s business.[48]
11A Additional
requirements for financial groups and DNFBP groups[49]
(1) This
Article applies to a financial group of which a relevant person is a
member.
(2) In
addition to the requirements in Article 11, a financial group must
maintain a programme to prevent and detect money laundering that
includes –
(a) policies
and procedures by which a relevant person within a financial group, which
carries on financial services business or equivalent business, may disclose
information to a member of the same financial group, but only where such
disclosure is appropriate for the purpose of preventing and detecting money
laundering or managing money laundering risks;
(b) adequate
safeguards for the confidentiality and use of any such information;
(c) the
monitoring and management of compliance with, and the internal communication
of, such policies and procedures (including the appointment of a compliance
officer for the financial group); and
(d) the
screening of employees.
(3) In
this Article, “information” includes the following –
(a) information
or evidence obtained from applying identification measures;
(b) customer,
account and transaction information;
(c) information
relating to the analysis of transactions or activities that are considered
unusual.
(4) For the purposes of
this Article, “financial group” includes a group of persons falling
within Part 3 of Schedule 2 to the Law (designated non-financial
businesses and professions) if there is, in relation to the group, a parent
company or other legal person that exercises control over every member of the
group.[50]
12 Exception
from Article 11[51]
A sole trader need not
maintain policies and procedures relating to internal reporting, screening of
employees and the internal communication of such policies and procedures.
Part 3
Customer due diligence measures[52]
13 Application
and timing of customer due diligence measures[53]
(1) A
relevant person must apply –
(a) subject
to paragraphs (4) to (11), identification measures before the
establishment of a business relationship or before carrying out a one-off
transaction;
(b) on-going
monitoring during a business relationship;
(c) identification
measures where –
(i) the
relevant person suspects money laundering, or
(ii) the
relevant person has doubts about the veracity or adequacy of documents, data or
information previously obtained under the customer due diligence measures.[54]
(2) Where –
(a) a
relevant person has a business relationship with a customer that started before
4th February 2008; or
(b) the
relevant person carries on a business falling within any class of business
described in Schedule 2 to the Law on or after 19th February 2008 and each
of the conditions in paragraph (2A) applies,
the relevant person must apply customer due diligence measures, as
modified by paragraph (2B) in respect of on-going monitoring, to that
relationship at appropriate times on or after 1st April 2008.[55]
(2A) For the
purposes of paragraph (2)(b) the conditions are that –
(a) the
business carried on by the relevant person did not fall within that Schedule
before that date;
(b) the
relevant person has a business relationship with a customer within the course
of that business;
(c) that
business relationship started before 19th February 2008.[56]
(2B) For the
purposes of paragraph (2), on-going monitoring shall mean –
(a) the
scrutiny described in Article 3(3)(a); and
(b) ensuring
that documents, data or information –
(i) obtained
under identification measures, or
(ii) (if
applicable) obtained under identification measures –
(A) maintained
under the Money Laundering (Jersey) Order 1999 immediately before 4th February
2008, and
(B) held
immediately before 19th February 2008,
are kept up to date and relevant by undertaking reviews of existing
records, including, but without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing,
reviews where any inconsistency has been discovered as a result of applying the
scrutiny described in Article 3(3)(a).[57]
(3) For
the purposes of paragraph (2), subject to paragraph (3A),
“appropriate times” means –
(a) for
the application of identification measures –
(i) times
that are appropriate having regard to the degree of risk of money laundering
taking into account the type of customer, business relationship, product or
transaction concerned, and
(ii) times
when the circumstance described in paragraph (1)(c)(i) applies;
(b) for
the application of on-going monitoring, throughout the business relationship as
described in Article 3(3).[58]
(3A) The
appropriate time for applying the identification measure of finding out the
identity of a person (as required by Article 3(4)(a)) is a date that is
not later than 31st December 2014, or such later date as may be
agreed in writing by the Commission upon application by the relevant person to
the Commission on or before 31st December 2014.[59]
(3B) For the
purposes of paragraph (3A), the requirement of finding out the identity of
a person may be satisfied by a relevant person if the relevant person holds, in
relation to that person, information as to the person’s identity that is
commensurate to the relevant person’s assessment of the risk that the
continuing business relationship with that person will involve money
laundering.[60]
(4) Identification
of a person that is described in Article 3(4)(b) may be completed as soon
as reasonably practicable after the establishment of a business relationship
if –
(a) that
is necessary not to interrupt the normal conduct of business;
(b) there
is little risk of money laundering occurring as a result of completing such
identification after the establishment of that relationship; and
(c) the
risk of money laundering is effectively managed.[61]
(5) Where
a relevant person carries out a one-off transaction to which Article 4(1)(b)(ii),
Article 4(1)(d)(ii) or Article 4(1)(f)(ii) applies, that person must
apply identification measures as soon as reasonably practicable.[62]
(6) Identification
measures described in Article 3(4)(b) may be completed after the
establishment of a business relationship that relates to a life insurance
policy if –
(a) the
identification measures relate to a beneficiary under the policy; and
(b) the
relevant person is satisfied that there is little risk of money laundering
occurring as a result of completing such identification after the establishment
of that relationship.[63]
(7) Where
the identification measures are not completed, in accordance with paragraph (6),
before the establishment of the business relationship, they must be completed
before any payment is made under the policy or any right vested under the
policy is exercised.[64]
(8) Identification
measures described in Article 3(4)(b) may be completed after the
establishment of a business relationship that relates to a trust or foundation
if –
(a) the
identification measures relate to a person who has a beneficial interest in the
trust or foundation by virtue of property or income having been vested in that
person; and
(b) the
relevant person is satisfied that there is little risk of money laundering occurring
as a result of completing such identification after the establishment of that
relationship.[65]
(9) Where
the identification measures are not completed, in accordance with paragraph (8),
before the establishment of the business relationship, they must be completed
before any distribution of trust property or income is made.[66]
(10) Paragraph (11)
applies to a relevant person before establishing a business relationship,
or who is in a business relationship, with a holder of units in respect of any
of the following –
(a) a
recognized fund, within the meaning of the Collective Investment Funds
(Jersey) Law 1988;
(b) an
unclassified fund, within the meaning of the Collective Investment Funds
(Jersey) Law 1988;
(c) an
unregulated fund, within the meaning of the Collective Investment Funds
(Unregulated Funds) (Jersey) Order 2008;
(d) a
non-public fund (as defined in Article 17), being a fund, other
than a fund described in sub-paragraph (a), (b) or (c), in respect of which a service is provided by a business described in
paragraph 9 of Schedule 2 to the Law.[67]
(11) A
relevant person to whom this paragraph applies shall not be required to comply
with the obligations under paragraph (1) or Articles 15, 15A and 15B (if
applicable) in relation to a holder of any units in any such scheme or fund
if –
(a) the
holder of the units acquires the units through a secondary market transaction;
(b) a
person who is –
(i) carrying
on investment business and is registered to carry on such business under the Financial Services (Jersey)
Law 1998, or
(ii) carrying
on equivalent business to investment business,
has in relation to that holder applied the identification measures
specified in Article 3(2) or, if that person is
outside Jersey, has applied similar identification measures that satisfy
Recommendation 10 of the FATF Recommendations.[68]
(12) For the
purposes of paragraph (11) –
(a) “secondary
market” means a financial market in which previously issued units are
bought and sold;
(b) “unit”
has the same meaning as in Article 1(1) of the Collective Investment Funds
(Jersey) Law 1988.[69]
14 Termination
where customer due diligence measures are not completed[70]
(1) If
a relevant person is unable to apply the identification measures before the
establishment of a business relationship or before the carrying out of a
one-off transaction to the extent specified in Article 13(1)(a), that
person shall not establish that business relationship or carry out that one-off
transaction.[71]
(2) If
a relevant person is unable to apply the identification measures to the extent
that they involve identification of a person in the circumstances described in
Article 13(4), (6) or (8) after the establishment of a business
relationship, that person shall terminate that relationship.[72]
(3) If
a relevant person is unable to comply with Article 13(1)(b) in respect of
a business relationship, that person shall terminate that relationship.
(4) If
a relevant person is unable to comply with Article 13(5) in respect of a
one-off transaction, that person shall not complete or carry out any further
linked transactions in respect of that one-off transaction.
(5) Subject
to paragraph (6), if a relevant person is unable to apply the
identification measures in the cases described in Article 13(1)(c) in
respect of any business relationship or transaction with a person
(“transaction” having the meaning in paragraph (12)) the
relevant person shall not establish or shall terminate that business
relationship or shall not complete or carry out that transaction, as the case
requires.[73]
(6) A
relevant person is not required to apply any identification measures if the
relevant person –
(a) suspects
money laundering in respect of any business relationship or transaction with a
person;
(b) reasonably
believes that the application of identification measures is likely to alert the
person to the relevant person’s suspicions of money laundering;
(c) has
made a report under procedures maintained under Article 21 to the
Financial Intelligence Unit; and
(d) acting
with the consent of the Financial Intelligence Unit, terminates or does not
establish that business relationship or does not complete or carry out that
transaction.[74]
(7) Subject
to paragraph (6), if a relevant person is unable to apply the identification
measures at any appropriate time described in Article 13(3)(a) for the
purposes of Article 13(2) in respect of a business relationship that
person shall terminate that relationship.[75]
(8) Where
paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) or (7) applies a relevant person must
consider whether to make a report under Part 5.
(9) Subject
to paragraph (10), paragraphs (1) to (5) and (7) do not apply where
the relevant person is a person whose business falls within paragraph 21
or 22 of Schedule 2 to the Law and is in the course of ascertaining the
legal position for that person’s client or performing the task of
defending or representing the client in, or concerning, legal proceedings,
including advice on the institution or avoidance of proceedings.[76]
(10) In
paragraph (9), the relevant person must be a member of a professional body
which –
(a) is
established for persons carrying on business falling within paragraph 21
or 22 of Schedule 2 to the Law and which makes provision for –
(i) testing
the competence of those seeking admission to membership of such a body as a
condition for such admission, and
(ii) imposing
and maintaining professional and ethical standards for its members, as well as
imposing sanctions for non-compliance with those standards; and
(b) is
established in respect of the business in the course of which the relevant
person carries out the activities described in paragraph (9).[77]
(11) If a
report is made under procedures maintained under Article 21 to the
Financial Intelligence Unit, paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (7) do
not apply to the extent that the relevant person is acting with the consent of the
Financial Intelligence Unit.[78]
(12) For the
purposes of this Article, “transaction” means any transaction other
than one carried out in the course of a business relationship, whether or not
it is a one-off transaction or a transaction that falls within Article 4(1)(b),
(d) or (f).[79]
15 Circumstances for applying enhanced customer due diligence measures[80]
(1) A
relevant person must apply enhanced customer due diligence measures on a
risk-sensitive basis in the following circumstances –
(a) if
a customer has, or proposes to have, a business relationship or proposes to
carry out a one-off transaction with the relevant person and the relevant
person is not resident in the customer’s country of residence or in the
same country as the country from which, or from within which, the customer is
carrying on business;
(b) if
a customer has not been physically present for identification purposes;
(c) if
the relevant person has or proposes to have a business relationship or proposes
to carry out a one-off transaction with a customer having a relevant connection
with a country or territory (an “enhanced risk state”) in relation
to which the FATF has called for the application of enhanced customer due
diligence measures;
(d) if
the customer of the relevant person is a company with nominee shareholders or
that issues shares in bearer form;
(da) if the customer
of the relevant person is a limited liability company with nominee LLC interest
holders;
(e) if
the customer of the relevant person is –
(i) a
legal person established by an individual for the purpose of holding assets for
investment purposes, or
(ii) a
person acting on behalf of a legal arrangement established for an individual
for the purpose of holding assets for investment;
(f) if
the relevant person provides or proposes to provide a customer with private
banking services;
(g) any
situation which by its nature can present a higher risk of money laundering.[81]
(2) For
the purposes of paragraph (1)(c) –
(a) a
“customer” includes any of the following –
(i) a
beneficial owner or controller of the customer,
(ii) a
third party for whom the customer is acting,
(iii) a
beneficial owner or controller of a third party described in clause (ii),
(iv) a
person acting, or purporting to act, on behalf of the customer; and
(b) a
person has a relevant connection with an enhanced risk state if the person is –
(i) the
government or a public authority of that state,
(ii) in
relation to that state, a foreign politically exposed person (within the
meaning of Article 15A),
(iii) a
person resident in that state,
(iv) a
person having an address for business in that state,
(v) a
customer, where the source of the customer’s funds is or derives from
assets held in that state by the customer or by any person on behalf of the
customer or income arising in that state.[82]
(3) In
this Article, a service is a “private banking service” if the
service is offered, or it is proposed to offer the service, only to persons
identified by the service provider as being eligible for the service, having
regard to the person’s net worth, and the service –
(a) involves
a high value investment;
(b) is
a non-standard banking or investment service tailored to the person’s
needs, or uses corporate or trust investment structures, tailored to the
person’s needs; or
(c) offers
opportunities for investment in more than one jurisdiction.
15A Enhanced customer
due diligence measures in relation to politically exposed persons[83]
(1) This
Article applies to a relevant person –
(a) who
has or proposes to have a business relationship with, or proposes to carry out
a one-off transaction with, a foreign politically exposed person; or
(b) who
has or proposes to have a high risk business relationship, or proposes to carry
out a high risk one-off transaction with, a domestic politically exposed person
or prominent person; or
(c) if
any of the following is a foreign politically exposed person or, in the case of
a high risk business relationship or one-off transaction, a domestic politically
exposed person or prominent person –
(i) a
beneficial owner or controller of the customer of the relevant person,
(ii) a
third party for whom the customer of the relevant person is acting,
(iii) a
beneficial owner or controller of a third party described in clause (ii),
(iv) a
person acting or purporting to act on behalf of the customer of the relevant
person.
(2) A
relevant person to whom this Article applies must apply enhanced customer
due diligence measures on a risk-sensitive basis including –
(a) unless
the relevant person is a sole trader, measures requiring a new business
relationship or continuation of a business relationship or a new one-off
transaction to be approved by the senior management of the relevant person;
(b) measures
to establish the source of the wealth of the politically exposed person and
source of the funds involved in the business relationship or one-off
transaction;
(c) measures
to conduct the enhanced on-going monitoring of that relationship; and
(d) if
the relevant business relationship relates to a high risk life insurance
policy –
(i) measures
requiring the senior management to be informed before any payment is made under
the policy or any right vested under the policy is exercised, and
(ii) measures
to consider whether to make a disclosure under Article 21(2).
(2A) A relevant person may treat a
domestic politically exposed person as not being a politically exposed person
2 years after the person ceases to be entrusted with a prominent public
function if the relevant person is satisfied –
(a) that,
following a risk assessment, the person does not present a higher risk of money
laundering; and
(b) that
there is no reason to continue to treat the person as a politically exposed
person.[84]
(2B) A relevant person may treat a foreign
politically exposed person as not being a politically exposed person
5 years after the person ceases to be entrusted with a prominent public
function if the relevant person is satisfied –
(a) that,
following a risk assessment, the person does not present a higher risk of money
laundering; and
(b) that
there is no reason to continue to treat the person as a politically exposed
person.[85]
(2C) A relevant person may treat a
prominent person as not being a politically exposed person 5 years after
the person ceases to be entrusted with a prominent public function by an
international organisation if the relevant person is satisfied –
(a) that,
following a risk assessment, the person does not present a higher risk of money
laundering; and
(b) that
there is no reason to continue to treat the person as a politically exposed
person.[86]
(2D) Paragraphs (2A) to (2C) apply
to immediate family members or close associates of the politically exposed
person in question as they do to that person.[87]
(3) In
this Article –
“close associate” of a person includes any person who is
known to maintain a close business relationship with the person, including a
person who is in a position to conduct substantial financial transactions on
behalf of the person;
“domestic politically exposed person” means a person who
is an individual who is or has been entrusted with a prominent public function
in Jersey including but not limited to –
(a) heads
of state, heads of government, senior politicians;
(b) senior
government, judicial or military officials;
(c) senior
executives of state owned corporations; and
(d) important
political party officials,
and includes an immediate family member or a close associate of the
person;
“enhanced on-going monitoring” means on-going monitoring
that involves specific and adequate measures to compensate for the higher risk
of money laundering;
“foreign politically exposed person” means a person who
is an individual who is or has been entrusted with a prominent public function
in a country or territory outside Jersey including but not limited
to –
(a) heads
of state, heads of government, senior politicians;
(b) senior
government, judicial or military officials;
(c) senior
executives of state owned corporations; and
(d) important
political party officials,
and includes an immediate family member or a close associate of the
person;
“high risk”, in relation to a business relationship or
one-off transaction, means any situation which by its nature can present a
higher risk of money laundering;
“immediate family member” includes any of the
following –
(a) a
spouse;
(b) a
partner, that is someone considered by his or her national law as equivalent or
broadly equivalent to a spouse;
(c) children
and their spouses or partners (as defined in sub-paragraph (b));
(d) parents;
(e) grandparents
and grandchildren;
(f) siblings;
“prominent person” means a person who is an individual
who is or has been entrusted with a prominent public function by an
international organisation, and includes an immediate family member or a close
associate of the person;
“prominent public function”,
in relation to an international organisation, means a member of the senior
management, including a director, deputy director, board member or other
equivalent function;
“source of the wealth” means the source generating the
total net worth of funds of the politically exposed person, whether those funds
are used in the business relationship or one-off transaction.[88]
(4) For
the purpose of deciding whether a person is a close associate of a person, a
relevant person need only have regard to information which is in that
person’s possession or is publicly known.
15B Enhanced customer
due diligence measures in relation to cross-border correspondent banking and
other similar relationships[89]
(1) This Article applies to
a Jersey financial institution or Jersey VASP (virtual asset service provider)
which has or proposes to have a correspondent banking or similar relationship
with a foreign financial institution or foreign VASP.[90]
(2) A
Jersey financial institution or Jersey VASP must apply enhanced customer due
diligence measures on a risk-sensitive basis including –
(a) gathering
sufficient information about the foreign financial institution or foreign VASP
to understand fully the nature of its business;
(b) determining
the reputation of the foreign financial institution or foreign VASP and the
quality of its supervision, including whether it has been subject to any money
laundering investigation or regulatory action;
(c) assessing
the systems and controls of the foreign financial institution or foreign VASP
to combat money laundering in order to determine whether they are consistent
with the requirements of the FATF recommendations and their effectiveness;
(d) requiring
any new relationship to be approved by the senior management of the Jersey
financial institution or Jersey VASP;
(e) ensuring
that all parties clearly understand their respective responsibilities to
prevent and detect money laundering and recording those responsibilities; and
(f) being
satisfied that, in respect of customers of the foreign financial institution or
foreign VASP who have services provided directly by the Jersey financial
institution or Jersey VASP, that the foreign financial institution or foreign
VASP has applied customer due diligence measures at least equivalent to those
set out in this Order and is able to provide a copy, at the request of the
Jersey financial institution or Jersey VASP, of the evidence, documents, data
and information obtained when applying such measures.[91]
(3) In this Article –
“foreign financial institution”
means a person who carries on financial business falling within Part 2
(financial institutions) of Schedule 2 to the Law outside Jersey and is
not a Jersey financial institution;
“foreign VASP”
means a person who carries on financial business falling within Part 4
(virtual asset service provider) of Schedule 2 to the Law outside Jersey
and is not a Jersey financial institution;
“Jersey financial institution”
means –
(a) a
person who carries on financial services business falling within Part 2
(financial institutions) of Schedule 2 to the Law in or from within
Jersey; or
(b) a
person that is incorporated or constituted under the law of Jersey and carries
on such financial services business in any part of the world;
“Jersey VASP”
means –
(a) a
person who carries on financial services business falling within Part 4
(virtual asset service provider) of Schedule 2 to the Law in or from
within Jersey; or
(b) a
person that is incorporated or constituted under the law of Jersey and carries
on such financial services business in any part of the world.[92]
16 Reliance
on relevant person or person carrying on equivalent business[93]
(1) In
this Article –
“customer of the obliged person” means –
(a) a
customer of the obliged person;
(b) a beneficial
owner or controller of that customer;
(c) a
third party for whom that customer is acting;
(d) a
beneficial owner or controller of a third party for whom that customer is
acting; or
(e) a
person purporting to act on behalf of that customer;
“reliance identification measures” means –
(a) the
identification measures specified in Article 3(2)(a), (aa), (b) or (c); or
(b) if
the obliged person is not in Jersey, similar identification measures that the
obliged person applies that satisfy Recommendation 10 of the FATF
recommendations.
(2) A
relevant person may, for the purpose of complying with Article 13(1)(a) or
(c)(ii), Article 15(1)(a), (b), (d), (e) or (g) or Article 15A, rely
on an obliged person to apply reliance identification measures in respect of a
customer of the obliged person, but only if –
(a) the
obliged person consents to the reliance;
(b) the
obliged person immediately provides the relevant person with the information
obtained from applying the reliance identification measures; and
(c) the
requirements in paragraphs (3), (4) and (5) are met.
(3) Before
relying on the obliged person, the relevant person must assess the risk of
doing so and make a written record of the reasons the relevant person considers
that it is appropriate to do so, having regard to –
(a) the
higher risk of money laundering should the obliged person fail to carry
out any action specified in the assurances obtained under paragraphs (4)
and (5); and
(b) the
risk that the obliged person will fail to provide the relevant person with
evidence in accordance with paragraph (5)(b).
(4) The
relevant person must obtain adequate assurance in writing from the obliged
person that, in the course of an established business relationship or one-off
transaction, the obliged person –
(a) has
applied reliance identification measures in relation to the customer;
(b) has
not relied on another party to have applied any reliance identification
measures;
(c) has
not, in reliance on any provision in Part 3A (or if the obliged person is
not in Jersey, a provision of similar effect), applied measures that are less
than equivalent to the reliance identification measures; and
(d) is
required to keep and does keep evidence of the identification (as described in
Article 3(4)(b)) relating to each of the obliged person’s customers,
including a record of such evidence.
(5) The
relevant person must obtain adequate assurance in writing from the obliged
person that the obliged person will –
(a) keep
the evidence obtained from applying the reliance identification measures
until –
(i) the
evidence has been provided to the relevant person, or
(ii) the
obliged person has been notified by the relevant person that the relevant
person no longer requires that evidence to be kept; and
(b) if
requested by the relevant person, provide the relevant person with that
evidence without delay.
(6) For
the purpose of paragraphs (4) and (5) –
(a) assurance
is adequate if it is reasonably capable of being regarded as reliable and the
person who relies on it is satisfied that it is reliable; and
(b) assurance
may be given in relation to one or more business relationships and for more
than one transaction.
(7) A
relevant person (including a person who was formerly a relevant person) who has
given an assurance to another person under paragraph (5) (or under an
equivalent provision that applies outside Jersey) must, if requested by the
other person, provide the person with the evidence obtained from applying the
reliance identification measures.
(8) A
relevant person who relies on an obliged person under this Article must conduct
such tests in such manner and at such intervals as the relevant person
considers appropriate in all the circumstances in order to establish
whether –
(a) the
obliged person has appropriate and consistent policies and procedures in place
to apply reliance identification measures;
(b) if
the obliged person has not already provided the evidence to the relevant
person, the obliged person –
(i) keeps
the evidence that the obliged person has obtained during the course of applying
reliance identification measures in respect of a person, and
(ii) if
requested by the relevant person, provides the relevant person with that
evidence without delay; and
(c) the
obliged person may be prevented, by application of a law, from providing the
required information or evidence.
(9) If,
as a result of carrying out any such test, a relevant person is not satisfied
that the obliged person is meeting a requirement specified in paragraph (8)(a)
or (b), the relevant person must immediately apply reliance identification
measures.
(10) Despite
a relevant person’s reliance on an obliged person under this Article, a
relevant person is liable for any failure to apply reliance identification
measures.
(11) Nothing
in this Article permits a relevant person to rely on the reliance
identification measures of an obliged person if –
(a) the
relevant person suspects money laundering;
(b) the
relevant person considers that there is a higher risk of money laundering on
the basis of the assessment made under paragraph (3); or
(c) the
obliged person is a person having a relevant connection with an enhanced risk
state (within the meaning of Article 15).
16A Reliance on
persons in same financial group as relevant person[94]
(1) In
this Article –
“external person” means a person outside Jersey
who –
(a) is
not an obliged person;
(b) is
a member of the same financial group as the relevant person; and
(c) carries
on a business which, if that business were carried on in Jersey, would be a
financial services business;
“similar identification measures” means similar measures
to those specified in Article 3(2)(a), (aa), (b) and (c) that satisfy
Recommendation 10 of the FATF recommendations.
(2) A
relevant person may, for the purpose of complying with Article 13(1)(a) or
(c)(ii), Article 15(1)(a), (b), (d), (e) or (g) or Article 15A, rely
on an external person to apply similar identification measures, but only
if –
(a) the
external person consents to the reliance;
(b) the
external person immediately provides the relevant person with the information
obtained from applying similar identification measures;
(c) the
financial group applies the customer due diligence measures and record keeping
requirements required under this Order or in Recommendations 10, 11 and 12 of
the FATF recommendations;
(d) the
financial group to which the relevant person and the external person belong
maintains a programme against money laundering, which includes policies and
procedures by which every member of the financial group who carries on financial
services business or equivalent business shares information that is appropriate
for the purpose of preventing and detecting money laundering;
(e) any
higher risk of money laundering is adequately mitigated by the policies and
procedures applied by the external person;
(f) the
implementation of customer due diligence and record keeping requirements, and
of the programme referred to in sub-paragraph (d), are supervised by an
overseas regulatory authority; and
(g) the
requirements in paragraphs (3), (4) and (5) have been met.
(3) Before
relying on an external person, the relevant person must assess the risk of
doing so and make a written record of the reasons the relevant person considers
that it is appropriate to do so, having regard to –
(a) the
higher risk of money laundering should the external person fail to carry
out any action specified in the assurances obtained under paragraphs (4)
and (5); and
(b) the
risk that the external person will fail to provide the relevant person with
evidence in accordance with paragraph (5)(b).
(4) The
relevant person must obtain adequate assurance in writing from the external
person that, in the course of an established business relationship or one-off
transaction, the external person –
(a) has
applied similar identification measures in relation to the customer;
(b) has
not relied on another party to have applied any of those identification
measures;
(c) has
not, in reliance on any provision of similar effect to a provision in
Part 3A, applied measures that are less than equivalent to similar
identification measures; and
(d) is
required to keep and does keep evidence of the identification (as described in
Article 3(4)(b)) relating to each of the external person’s
customers, including a record of such evidence.
(5) The
relevant person must obtain adequate assurance in writing from the external
person that the external person will –
(a) keep
the evidence obtained from applying similar identification measures
until –
(i) the
evidence has been provided to the relevant person, or
(ii) the
external person has been notified by the relevant person that the relevant
person no longer requires that evidence to be kept; and
(b) if
requested by the relevant person, provide the relevant person with that
evidence without delay.
(6) For
the purpose of paragraphs (4) and (5) –
(a) assurance
is adequate if it is reasonably capable of being regarded as reliable and the
person who relies on it is satisfied that it is reliable; and
(b) assurance
may be given in relation to one or more business relationships and for more
than one transaction.
(7) A
relevant person who relies on an external person under this Article must
conduct such tests in such manner and at such intervals as the relevant person
considers appropriate in all the circumstances in order to establish
whether –
(a) the
external person has appropriate and consistent policies and procedures in place
to apply similar identification measures;
(b) if
the external person has not already provided the evidence to the relevant
person, the external person –
(i) keeps
the evidence that the external person has obtained during the course of
applying similar identification measures in respect of a person, and
(ii) if
requested by the relevant person, provides the relevant person with that
evidence without delay; and
(c) the
external person may be prevented, by application of a law, from providing the
required information or evidence.
(8) If,
as a result of carrying out any such test, a relevant person is not satisfied
that the external person is meeting a requirement specified in paragraph (7)(a)
or (b), the relevant person must immediately apply similar identification
measures.
(9) Despite
a relevant person’s reliance on an external person under this Article, a
relevant person is liable for any failure to apply similar identification
measures.
(10) Nothing
in this Article permits a relevant person to rely on similar identification
measures applied by an external person if –
(a) the
relevant person suspects money laundering;
(b) the
relevant person considers that there is a higher risk of money laundering on
the basis of the assessment made under paragraph (3); or
(c) the
external person is a person having a relevant connection with an enhanced risk
state (within the meaning of Article 15).
Part 3A[95]
Exemptions from customer due diligence requirements
17 Interpretation
of Part 3A[96]
In this Part –
“relevant customer” means a customer of a relevant
person that the relevant person knows or reasonably believes is –
(a) a
relevant person in respect of whose financial services business the Commission
discharges supervisory functions, or a person carrying on equivalent business;
or
(b) a
person wholly owned by a relevant person specified in sub-paragraph (a)
(the “parent”), but only if –
(i) the
person is incorporated or registered in the same jurisdiction as the parent,
(ii) the
person has no customers who are not customers of the parent,
(iii) the
person’s activity is ancillary to the business in respect of which the
Commission discharges supervisory functions, or to equivalent business carried
on by the parent, and
(iv) in
relation to that activity, the person maintains the same policies and
procedures as the parent;
“non-public fund” means a scheme falling within the
definition of “collective investment fund” in Article 3 of the
Collective Investment Funds
(Jersey) Law 1988, except that the offer of units in the scheme or arrangement is not
an offer to the public within the meaning of that Article;
“third party identification requirements” means the
requirements of Article 13 or 15 to apply the identification measures
specified in Article 3(2)(b).
17A Circumstances in
which exemptions under this Part do not apply[97]
(1) A
relevant person is not exempt under this Part from applying identification
requirements if –
(a) the
relevant person suspects money laundering;
(b) the
relevant person considers that there is a higher risk of money laundering;
(c) the
relevant customer is resident in a country that is not compliant with the FATF
recommendations; or
(d) the
relevant customer is a person in respect of whom Article 15(1)(c) applies.[98]
(2) [99]
17B Exemption from
applying third party identification requirements in relation to relevant
customers acting in certain regulated, investment or fund services business[100]
(1) A
relevant person is exempt from applying third party identification requirements
in relation to a third party for which a relevant customer is acting where the
relevant customer is acting in the course of a business –
(a) that
falls within paragraph (a), (b) or (d) in the definition of
“regulated business”, or equivalent business; or
(b) that
is an investment business or fund services business registered under the Financial Services (Jersey)
Law 1998, or equivalent business.
(2) A
relevant person must record the reasons for applying the exemption, having
regard to the risk of money laundering inherent in the relevant
customer’s business and the higher risk of money laundering associated
with that type of business should the relevant customer fail to –
(a) apply
the identification measures specified in Article 3(2)(b) or if the
relevant customer is not in Jersey, similar identification measures required to
be applied to satisfy the requirements in Recommendation 10 of the FATF
recommendations; or
(b) keep
records, or keep them for the period required to be kept.
17C Exemption
from applying third party identification requirements in relation to certain
relevant customers involved in unregulated or non-public funds, trust company
business or the legal profession[101]
(1) A
relevant person is exempt from applying third party identification requirements
in relation to a third party for which a relevant customer is acting if the
relevant customer –
(a) is,
or carries on business in respect of, an unregulated fund, within the meaning
of the Collective Investment Funds
(Unregulated Funds) (Jersey) Order 2008, or equivalent business;
(b) is,
or carries on business in respect of, a fund that is a non-public fund, being a
fund in respect of which a service is provided that is described in paragraph 9
of Schedule 2 to the Law, or equivalent business;
(c) carries
on trust company business and is registered to carry on such business under the
Financial Services (Jersey)
Law 1998, or equivalent business, but only if the relevant person
is –
(i) carrying
on deposit-taking business,
(ii) a
lawyer carrying on business described in paragraph 21 of Schedule 2
to the Law, or
(iii) an
accountant carrying on a business described in paragraph 22 of Schedule 2
to the Law; or
(d) is
an independent legal professional carrying on a business described in paragraph 21
of Schedule 2 to the Law and is registered to carry on such business under
the Proceeds of Crime
(Supervisory Bodies) (Jersey) Law 2008, but only if the relevant
person is carrying on deposit-taking business.[102]
(2) A
relevant person who, by virtue of paragraph (1), does not apply third
party identification requirements must –
(a) be
satisfied, by reason of the nature of the relationship with the relevant
customer, that there is little risk of money laundering occurring; and
(b) obtain
adequate assurance in writing from the relevant customer that the relevant customer –
(i) has
applied the identification measures specified in Article 3(2)(b) to the
third party, or if the relevant customer is not in Jersey, has applied similar
identification measures that would satisfy the requirements in recommendations
10 and 12 of the FATF recommendations,
(ii) will
provide the relevant person, without delay and in writing, with the information
obtained from applying the identification measures, if so requested by the
relevant person,
(iii) will
keep the evidence obtained during the course of applying the identification
measures, and
(iv) will
provide the relevant person with that evidence without delay, if requested to
do so by the relevant person.
(3) In
this Article –
(a) assurance
is adequate if it is reasonably capable of being regarded as reliable and the
person who relies on it is satisfied that it is reliable;
(b) assurance
may be given in relation to one or more business relationships and for more
than one transaction; and
(c) assurance
need not be given before deciding not to comply with third party requirements
if an assurance has previously been given by that customer to the relevant
person in relation to a business relationship or transaction.
(4) A
relevant person (including a person who was formerly a relevant person) who has
given an assurance to another person under paragraph (2)(b) (or under an
equivalent provision that applies outside Jersey) may, if requested by the
other person, provide the person with the information or evidence obtained from
applying the identification measures referred to in paragraph (2)(b)(i).[103]
17D Obligations of
relevant person who is exempt from applying third party identification
requirements[104]
(1) This
Article applies to a relevant person who, by virtue of the exemption under
Article 17C, does not apply third party identification requirements.[105]
(2) A
relevant person must record the reasons for applying the exemption, having
regard to the risk of money laundering inherent in the relevant
customer’s business and the higher risk of money laundering associated
with that type of business should the relevant customer fail to –
(a) apply
the identification measures specified in Article 3(2)(b) or if the
relevant customer is not in Jersey, similar identification measures required to
be applied to satisfy the requirements in Recommendation 10 of the FATF
recommendations; or
(b) keep
records, or keep them for the period required to be kept.
(3) A
relevant person must, in the manner, and as often as, the relevant person
considers appropriate in all the circumstances, conduct tests in order to
establish whether the relevant customer –
(a) has
appropriate policies and procedures in place to apply the identification
measures described in Articles 13(1)(a), 13(1)(c)(ii) and 15 (or if the
relevant customer is not in Jersey, similar identification measures that
satisfy the FATF recommendations in respect of identification measures);
(b) obtains
information in relation to the third party;
(c) keeps
the information or evidence that has been obtained in relation to the third
party; and
(d) provides
the relevant person with that information or evidence without delay, if
requested to do so by the relevant person,
and in conducting such tests consider whether the relevant customer
may be prevented, by application of a law, from providing that information or
evidence.[106]
(4) If ,
as a result of conducting tests under paragraph (3), the relevant person
is unable to establish that the relevant customer complies with the
requirements mentioned in paragraph (3)(b), (c) or (d), the relevant
person must immediately apply the identification measures specified in Article 13(1)(a)
and 13(1)(c)(ii).[107]
18 Further
exemptions from applying identification requirements[108]
(1) A
relevant person is exempt from applying the identification measures specified
in Article 13 in respect of insurance business if –
(a) in
the case of a policy of insurance in connection with a pension scheme taken out
by virtue of a person’s contract of employment or occupation, the policy
contains no surrender clause and may not be used as collateral security for a
loan;
(b) a
premium is payable in one instalment of an amount not exceeding £1,750;
or
(c) a
periodic premium is payable and the total amount payable in respect of any
calendar year does not exceed £750.
(2) A
relevant person is exempt from applying the identification measures specified
in Article 13 if –
(a) the
business relationship or one-off transaction relates to a pension,
superannuation, employee benefit, share option or similar scheme;
(b) the
contributions to the scheme are made by an employer or by way of deductions
from wages;
(c) the
rules of the scheme do not permit the assignment of an interest of a member of
the scheme except after the death of the member; and
(d) the
interest of a deceased member of the scheme is not being assigned.
(3) A
relevant person is exempt from applying the identification requirements in
Article 13 in respect of the measures specified in Article 3(2)(a),
(aa) and (c) in relation to a customer if the customer is –
(a) a
regulated person;
(b) a
person who carries on equivalent business to any category of regulated
business; or
(c) a
person wholly owned by a person (the “parent”) mentioned in
sub-paragraph (a) or (b), but only if –
(i) the
person is incorporated or registered in the same jurisdiction as the parent,
(ii) the
person has no customers who are not customers of the parent,
(iii) the
person’s activity is ancillary to the regulated business or equivalent
business carried on by the parent,
(iv) in
relation to that activity, the person maintains the same policies and
procedures as the parent.
(4) A
relevant person is exempt from applying the identification requirements in
Article 13 in respect of the measures specified in Article 3(2)(a)
and (aa) (in so far as those measures require identifying any person purporting
to act on behalf of the customer), 3(2)(c)(ii) and 3(2)(c)(iii) in relation to
a customer if the customer is –
(a) a
public authority acting in that capacity;
(b) a
body corporate or limited liability company the securities of which are listed
on an IOSCO-compliant market or on a regulated market (within the meaning of
Article 2(5)); or
(c) a
person wholly owned by a person mentioned in sub-paragraph (b).[109]
(5) A
relevant person is exempt from applying the identification requirements in
Article 13 in respect of the measures specified in Article 3(2)(aa)
(in so far as those measures require identifying any person purporting to act
on behalf of a customer) in relation to a person if –
(a) the
person is authorised to act on behalf of the customer;
(b) the
customer is not a relevant person;
(c) the
person acts on behalf of the customer in the course of employment by a person
carrying on a financial services business; and
(d) the
financial services business is a regulated business or an equivalent business
to a regulated business.
(6) A
relevant person is exempt from applying the identification requirements in
Article 13 to the extent that the measures require identification of a
person within the meaning of Article 3(4)(b) if –
(a) the
relevant person’s business falls within paragraph 19 or 21 of Schedule 2
to the Law; and
(b) that
person enters into a business relationship or carries out a one-off transaction
for the purpose of enabling a customer, directly or indirectly, to enter into a
registered contract (within the meaning of the Control of Housing and Work
(Jersey) Law 2012).[110]
Part 4
Record-keeping requirements[111]
A19 Interpretation of
Part 4[112]
In this Part
“relevant person” includes a person who was formerly a relevant
person.
19 Records
to be kept
(1) A relevant
person must keep the records specified in paragraphs (2) and (2A).[113]
(2) This
paragraph refers to –
(a) a
record comprising –
(i) a
copy of the evidence of identity obtained pursuant to the application of
customer due diligence measures or information that enables a copy of such
evidence to be obtained, and
(ii) all
the supporting documents, data or information that have been obtained in
respect of a business relationship or one-off transaction following the
application of customer due diligence measures, including the results of
analysis undertaken in relation to the business relationship or any transaction;
(b) a
record containing details relating to each transaction carried out by the
relevant person in the course of any business relationship or one-off
transaction.[114]
(2A) This paragraph
refers to the records, if any, that –
(a) the relevant person was
required to keep immediately before 4th February 2008 under record keeping
procedures maintained under Article 8 of the Money Laundering (Jersey) Order
1999; and
(b) the
relevant person held immediately before 19th February 2008.[115]
(3) The
record to which paragraph (2)(b) refers must in any event include
sufficient information to enable the reconstruction of individual transactions.
(4) The
relevant person must keep the records to which paragraphs (2)
and (2A) refer in such a manner that those records can be made available swiftly
to the Commission, the Financial Intelligence Unit, a police officer or customs
officer for the purposes of complying with a requirement under any enactment.[116]
(5) [117]
(6) [118]
(7) A relevant
person may make available to another person, being a person who is carrying on
an equivalent business, at that other person’s request, a copy of the
evidence, documents, data and information referred to in Article 15B(2)(f).[119]
20 Periods
for which records must be kept
(1) Where
the records described in Article 19(2)(a) or (2A) relate to a business
relationship, a relevant person must keep those records for a period of at
least 5 years commencing with the date on which the business relationship
ends.[120]
(2) Where
the records described in Article 19(2)(a) or (2A) relate to a one-off
transaction, a relevant person must keep those records for a period of at least
5 years commencing with the date on which the one-off transaction is
completed.[121]
(3) A
relevant person must keep the records described in Article 19(2)(b)
or (2A) in relation to each transaction for a period of 5 years
commencing with the date on which all activities taking place within the course
of that transaction were completed.[122]
(4) For
the purposes of paragraph (2) a one-off transaction is completed on the
date of completion of all activities taking place in that transaction.
(4A) For the
avoidance of doubt, the date described in paragraphs (1), (2) and (3)
from which the period referred to in those paragraphs commences may be a date
that occurred before 4th February 2008.[123]
(5) The
Commission may notify to the relevant person a period longer than 5 years
for the purposes of paragraphs (1), (2) or (3) and such longer period
shall apply instead of the 5 years specified in those paragraphs.
Part 5
Reporting and disclosure[124]
21 Reporting
procedures and related disclosure requirements[125]
(1) Reporting
procedures maintained by a relevant person are in accordance with this Article
if they comply with the following requirements –
(a)
(b)
(c) they
must provide for securing that a report is made to the person who is referred
to in paragraph (6)(a), (b) and (c) in accordance with the provisions
mentioned in those sub-paragraphs and they must communicate the identity of
that person;
(d) they
must provide that if a report is made to a designated person, it must be
considered by that person, in the light of all other relevant information, for
the purpose of determining whether or not the information or other matter
contained in the report does give rise to knowledge, suspicion or reasonable
grounds for knowledge or suspicion that another person is engaged in money
laundering;
(e) they
must provide that if a report is made to a designated person, the report must
(subject to Article 22) be forwarded by the designated person to the
reporting officer;
(f) they
must provide that if a report is made or forwarded to the reporting officer, it
must be considered by the reporting officer, in the light of all other relevant
information, for the purpose of determining whether or not the information or
other matter contained in the report does give rise to knowledge, suspicion or
reasonable grounds for knowledge or suspicion that another person is engaged in
money laundering;
(g) they
must provide for the reporting officer, and any designated person through whom
the report is made, to have access to all other relevant information that may
be of assistance to the reporting officer or that designated person, including,
in particular, the records that a relevant person must keep under Article 19;
(h) they
must provide for securing that the information or other matter contained in a
report is disclosed, by the person considering the report under sub-paragraph (d)
or (f), to the Financial Intelligence Unit as soon as is practicable, using the
approved form, where the person considering the report knows or suspects, or
has reasonable grounds for knowing or suspecting, that another person is
engaged in money laundering;
(ha) they must
provide for securing that the person who makes a disclosure under sub-paragraph (h)
provides the Financial Intelligence Unit with such additional information
relating to that disclosure as the Financial Intelligence Unit may reasonably
request and that such information is provided in such form and within such
reasonable period as the Financial Intelligence Unit may reasonably request;
(i) [126]
(2) If
a person considering a report under paragraph (1)(d) or (1)(f) knows or
suspects, or has reasonable grounds for knowing or suspecting, that another
person is engaged in money laundering, the first person must, as soon as is
practicable, make a disclosure to the Financial Intelligence Unit –
(a) by
using the approved form; and
(b) in
compliance with the requirements indicated on the approved form.[127]
(3) The
person making the disclosure under paragraph (2) must ensure
that –
(a) the
approved form is delivered in the manner indicated on the approved form; and
(b) any
information entered on or accompanying the approved form is legible.[128]
(4) A
person who makes a disclosure under paragraph (2) must provide the Financial
Intelligence Unit with such additional information relating to that disclosure
as the Financial Intelligence Unit may reasonably request in such form and
within such reasonable period as the Financial Intelligence Unit may require.[129]
(5) The
requirements described in paragraphs (1)(h), (1)(ha), (2) and (4) shall
not apply to a relevant person who is a professional legal adviser where the
information or matter that would otherwise be the subject of disclosure is an
item subject to legal privilege.[130]
(6) A
designated person or, if there is no such person, the reporting officer, shall
be –
(a) the
nominated officer referred to in Article 34D of the Law and Article 21
of the Terrorism Law;
(b) the
appropriate person referred to in Article 32(5) of the Law; and
(c) the
person to whom disclosure may be made under any procedure established by an
employer as described in Article 18(7) of the Terrorism Law.[131]
(7) In
this Article, “approved form” means the form approved by the
Minister for the purpose of this Article.[132]
22 Reports
that need not be forwarded
(1) If
a designated person, on considering a report under Article 21, concludes
that it does not give rise to knowledge, suspicion or reasonable grounds for knowledge
or suspicion that another person is engaged in money laundering, the designated
person need not forward it to the reporting officer.
(2) If
a designated person, on considering a report under Article 21, has
concluded that it does give rise to knowledge, suspicion or reasonable grounds
for knowledge or suspicion that another person is engaged in money laundering,
the reporting officer need not consider whether that other person is engaged in
money laundering.
22A Disclosure within
the relevant person’s organization[133]
A relevant person may disclose –
(a) the
information contained in any report for the purpose of any of the provisions
mentioned in Article 21(6);
(b) any
additional information required under Article 21(4);
(c) the
information contained in any record kept by the relevant person for the purpose
of this Order,
to any person or institution with whom or which the relevant person
shares common ownership, management or compliance control, or any person
within the same financial group as the relevant person, where such disclosure
is appropriate for the purpose of preventing and detecting money laundering.
23 Duty
to report evidence of money laundering
(1) If
the Commission –
(a) obtains
any information; and
(b) is
of the opinion that the information indicates that any person has or may have
been engaged in money laundering,
the Commission shall disclose that information to the Financial
Intelligence Unit as soon as is reasonably practicable.[134]
(2) If
a person is a secondary recipient of information obtained by the Commission,
and forms such an opinion as is described in paragraph (1)(b), the person
may disclose the information to the Financial Intelligence Unit.[135]
(3) If
any person specified in paragraph (4) –
(a) obtains
any information while acting in the course of any investigation, or discharging
any functions, to which the person’s authorization or appointment
relates; and
(b) is
of the opinion that the information indicates that any other person has or may
have been engaged in money laundering,
the first person shall as soon as is reasonably practicable disclose
that information to the persons specified in paragraph (5).
(4) The
persons to whom this paragraph refers are –
(a) a
person authorized by the Commission under Article 26 of the Banking Business (Jersey)
Law 1991 to require a person to provide information or produce documents;
(b) a
person appointed by the Commission under Article 28 of the Banking Business (Jersey)
Law 1991 to investigate and report to the Commission on a person or
business;
(c) a
person authorized by the Commission under Article 9 of the Collective Investment Funds
(Jersey) Law 1988 to require a person to furnish information or produce books or
papers;
(d) an
inspector appointed by the Commission under Article 22 of the Collective Investment Funds
(Jersey) Law 1988;
(e)
(f) an
inspector appointed under Article 128 of the Companies (Jersey)
Law 1991 to investigate and report on the affairs of a company;
(g) a
person authorized by the Court under Article 208 of the Companies (Jersey)
Law 1991 to inspect records of or under the control of a company;
(h) a
person authorized by the Commission under Article 10 of the Insurance Business (Jersey)
Law 1996 to require a person to produce information or documents;
(i) a
person appointed by the Court under Article 11 of the Insurance Business (Jersey)
Law 1996 to investigate and report to the Commission on a person or
business;
(j) an
inspector appointed under Regulation 41(3) of the Limited Liability
Partnerships (Dissolution and Winding Up) (Jersey) Regulations 2018;
(k) a
person providing a report under Article 8(5) of the Financial Services (Jersey)
Law 1998;
(l) a
person authorized by the Commission under Article 32 of the Financial Services (Jersey)
Law 1998 to require a person to provide information or documents or to
answer questions;
(m) a person
appointed by the Commission under Article 33 of the Financial Services (Jersey)
Law 1998 to investigate and report under that Article to the Commission;
(n) an
agent appointed by the Commission under Article 10(1) of the Financial Services Commission
(Jersey) Law 1998; and
(o) an
inspector appointed under Regulation 40 of the Limited Liability Companies
(Winding Up and Dissolution) (Jersey) Regulations 2022.[136]
(5) The
persons to whom this paragraph refers are –
(a) the
Financial Intelligence Unit; and
(b)
(c) the
Commission.[137]
(5A) If a
designated supervisory body (other than the Commission) –
(a) obtains
any information; and
(b) is
of the opinion that the information indicates that any person has or may have
been engaged in money laundering,
that body shall disclose that information to the Financial
Intelligence Unit as soon as is reasonably practicable.[138]
(5B) If a person is
a secondary recipient of information obtained by a designated supervisory body
(other than the Commission) and forms such an opinion as is described in
paragraph (5A)(b), the person may disclose the information to the
Financial Intelligence Unit.[139]
(5C) If any person
referred to in paragraph (5D) –
(a) obtains
any information while acting in the course of any investigation, or discharging
functions, to which the person’s authorization or appointment relates;
and
(b) is
of the opinion that the information indicates that any other person has or may
have been engaged in money laundering,
the first person shall as soon as reasonably practicable disclose
that information to the persons and bodies referred to in paragraph (5E).[140]
(5D) The persons to
whom this paragraph refers are –
(a) a
person authorized by a suitable supervisory body under Article 30 of the Proceeds
of Crime (Supervisory Bodies) Law to require a person to provide information or
documents or to answer questions; and
(b) a
person appointed by a suitable supervisory body under Article 31 of that
Law to investigate and report under that Article to that body.[141]
(5E) The persons
and bodies to whom this paragraph refers are –
(a) the
suitable supervisory body referred to in paragraph (5D); and
(b) the
Financial Intelligence Unit.
(c) [142]
(5F) In this
Article “suitable supervisory body” has the same meaning as in the Proceeds
of Crime (Supervisory Bodies) Law.[143]
(6) Disclosure
under this Article shall be made in writing.
Part 5A[144]
Other measures
23A Shell banks[145]
(1) A Jersey financial
institution or Jersey VASP must not enter into or continue a correspondent
banking relationship with a shell bank.[146]
(2) A Jersey financial
institution or Jersey VASP must take appropriate measures to ensure that it
does not enter into, or continue, a correspondent banking relationship with a
financial institution or VASP that is known to permit its accounts to be used
by a shell bank.[147]
(3) [148]
(4) In
this Article –
(a) “bank”
means a person or body carrying on a deposit-taking business within the meaning
of the Banking Business (Jersey) Law
1991
whether or not that business is carried on from within Jersey;
(aa) “financial
institution” includes a Jersey financial institution and a foreign
financial institution;
(ab) “foreign
financial institution” and “foreign VASP” have the meanings
given in Article 15B;
(ac) “Jersey
financial institution” and “Jersey VASP” have the meanings
given in Article 15B;
(b) “shell
bank” means a bank incorporated in a jurisdiction in which it has no
physical presence involving meaningful decision-making and management, and
which is not subject to supervision by the Commission or by an overseas
regulatory authority by reason of that bank’s connection with any other
institution or person; and
(c) “VASP”
includes a Jersey VASP and a foreign VASP.[149]
(5) For
the purposes of paragraph (4)(b), “connection” has the same
meaning as in Article 3A of the Income Tax (Jersey)
Law 1961.
23B Anonymous accounts[150]
A relevant person must not, in relation to any of that
person’s customers, set up an anonymous account or an account in a name
which it knows, or has reasonable cause to suspect, to be fictitious.
23C [151]
Part 6
Citation and exemptions[152]
24 Citation
and commencement
This Order may be cited as the Money Laundering (Jersey)
Order 2008.
24A [153]
24B [154]
25 Exemptions
for low risk financial services businesses[155]
The Proceeds of Crime (Low Risk
Financial Services Business) (Jersey) Order 2024 disapplies provisions of
this Order in respect of activities designated as low risk financial services
businesses.